On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:13:11 +0200, David Marchand wrote: > On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 1:34 AM Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thak...@arm.com> > wrote: > > > > Build the lib for Windows. > > > > Change-Id: Ib83431a9ee56a7b38445f0474cb9a12b17cf18f9 > > Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thak...@arm.com> > > --- > > lib/meson.build | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/lib/meson.build b/lib/meson.build > > index dd55b5cb53e4..1bb019720c6a 100644 > > --- a/lib/meson.build > > +++ b/lib/meson.build > > @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ if is_windows > > 'telemetry', > > 'eal', > > 'ring', > > + 'rcu', > > 'mempool', 'mbuf', 'net', 'meter', 'ethdev', 'pci', > > 'cmdline', > > 'hash', > > -- > > 2.17.1 > > > > If we skip the new failures in Intel CI due to kni build being broken, > I see that Windows build is fine but I have no log of it. > UNH lab skipped testing this patch, as it is a RFC (iiuc). > We need more tests, but on the principle, what do you think about enabling > rcu?
Builds OK with Linux/GCC (cross), Windows/MinGW-w64, Windows/clang. Tested-by: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozl...@gmail.com>
