On 10/15/2020 12:26 PM, Jerin Jacob wrote:
<...>
If we see some of the features of such kind or other PMDs adopts the
split feature - we'll try to find the common root and consider the way how
to report it.
My only concern with that approach will be ABI break again if
something needs to exposed over rte_eth_dev_info().
Let's reserve the pointer to struct rte_eth_rxseg_limitations
in the rte_eth_dev_info to avoid ABI break?
Works for me. If we add an additional reserved field.
Due to RC1 time constraint, I am OK to leave it as a reserved filed and fill
meat when it is required if other ethdev maintainers are OK.
I will be required for feature complete.
Sounds good to me.
