Hi Suanming,
Small comments,
PSB,
Best,
Ori
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Suanming Mou <suanmi...@nvidia.com>
> Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2020 11:20 AM
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ethdev: make rte flow API thread safe
>
> Currently, the rte flow functions are not defined as thread safety.
For a given port. (between ports they are thread safe)
> DPDK applications either call the functions in single thread or add
> locks around the functions for the critical section.
>
> For PMDs support the flow operations thread safe natively, the
> redundant protection in application hurts the performance of the
> rte flow operation functions.
>
> And the restriction of thread safety not guaranteed for the rte
> flow functions also limits the applications' expectation.
>
> This feature is going to change the rte flow functions to be thread
> safety. As different PMDs have different flow operations, some may
Safety => safe I think this is true also to other places in this patch.
> support thread safety already and others may not. For PMDs don't
> support flow thread safe operation, a new lock is defined in ethdev
> in order to protects thread unsafe PMDs from rte flow level.
>
> A new RTE_ETH_DEV_FLOW_OPS_THREAD_SAFE device flag is added to
> determine whether the PMD supports thread safe flow operation or not.
> For PMDs support thread safe flow operations, set the
> RTE_ETH_DEV_FLOW_OPS_THREAD_SAFE flag, rte flow level functions will
> skip the thread safe helper lock for these PMDs. Again the rte flow
> level thread safe lock only works when PMD operation functions are
> not thread safety.
safe
>
> For the PMDs which don't want the default mutex lock, just set the
> flag in the PMD, and add the perfer type of lock in the PMD. Then
> the default mutex lock is easily replaced by the PMD level lock.
>
> The change has no effect on the current DPDK applications. No change
> is required for the current DPDK applications. If no lock contention
> with the added rte flow level mutex, the mutex only does the atomic
> increasing in pthread_mutex_lock() and decreasing in
> pthread_mutex_unlock(). No futex() syscall will be involved.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suanming Mou <suanmi...@nvidia.com>
> ---
> doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst | 7 ++--
> drivers/net/mlx5/linux/mlx5_os.c | 2 +
> lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c | 2 +
> lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h | 2 +
> lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev_core.h | 4 ++
> lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.c | 84
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 6 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
> b/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
> index 119b128..6f7997a 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
> @@ -3046,10 +3046,6 @@ Caveats
> - API operations are synchronous and blocking (``EAGAIN`` cannot be
> returned).
>
> -- There is no provision for re-entrancy/multi-thread safety, although nothing
> - should prevent different devices from being configured at the same
> - time. PMDs may protect their control path functions accordingly.
> -
> - Stopping the data path (TX/RX) should not be necessary when managing flow
> rules. If this cannot be achieved naturally or with workarounds (such as
> temporarily replacing the burst function pointers), an appropriate error
> @@ -3101,6 +3097,9 @@ This interface additionally defines the following
> helper function:
> - ``rte_flow_ops_get()``: get generic flow operations structure from a
> port.
>
> +If PMD interfaces do not support re-entrancy/multi-thread safety, rte flow
> +level functions will do it by mutex.
> +
I think you should add which flag the app should test to see if the PMD
support thread safe.
> More will be added over time.
>
> Device compatibility
> diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/linux/mlx5_os.c
> b/drivers/net/mlx5/linux/mlx5_os.c
> index 2a4beb0..daefb7d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/linux/mlx5_os.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/linux/mlx5_os.c
> @@ -1351,6 +1351,8 @@
> goto error;
> }
> }
> + if (priv->config.dv_flow_en)
> + eth_dev->data->dev_flags =
> RTE_ETH_DEV_FLOW_OPS_THREAD_SAFE;
> return eth_dev;
I don't think this code is relevant for this patch.
I also think you are missing the | when assigning the value.
> error:
> if (priv) {
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> index dfe5c1b..d6fd17e 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> @@ -500,6 +500,7 @@ struct rte_eth_dev *
> strlcpy(eth_dev->data->name, name, sizeof(eth_dev->data->name));
> eth_dev->data->port_id = port_id;
> eth_dev->data->mtu = RTE_ETHER_MTU;
> + pthread_mutex_init(ð_dev->data->fts_mutex, NULL);
>
> unlock:
> rte_spinlock_unlock(&rte_eth_dev_shared_data->ownership_lock);
> @@ -562,6 +563,7 @@ struct rte_eth_dev *
> rte_free(eth_dev->data->mac_addrs);
> rte_free(eth_dev->data->hash_mac_addrs);
> rte_free(eth_dev->data->dev_private);
> + pthread_mutex_destroy(ð_dev->data->fts_mutex);
> memset(eth_dev->data, 0, sizeof(struct rte_eth_dev_data));
> }
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> index 645a186..61bd09f 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> @@ -1669,6 +1669,8 @@ struct rte_eth_dev_owner {
> #define RTE_ETH_DEV_REPRESENTOR 0x0010
> /** Device does not support MAC change after started */
> #define RTE_ETH_DEV_NOLIVE_MAC_ADDR 0x0020
> +/** Device PMD supports thread safety flow operation */
> +#define RTE_ETH_DEV_FLOW_OPS_THREAD_SAFE 0x0040
>
> /**
> * Iterates over valid ethdev ports owned by a specific owner.
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev_core.h
> b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev_core.h
> index fd3bf92..89df65a 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev_core.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev_core.h
> @@ -5,6 +5,9 @@
> #ifndef _RTE_ETHDEV_CORE_H_
> #define _RTE_ETHDEV_CORE_H_
>
> +#include <pthread.h>
> +#include <sys/types.h>
> +
> /**
> * @file
> *
> @@ -180,6 +183,7 @@ struct rte_eth_dev_data {
> * Valid if RTE_ETH_DEV_REPRESENTOR in dev_flags.
> */
>
> + pthread_mutex_t fts_mutex; /**< rte flow ops thread safety mutex. */
> uint64_t reserved_64s[4]; /**< Reserved for future fields */
> void *reserved_ptrs[4]; /**< Reserved for future fields */
> } __rte_cache_aligned;
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.c b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.c
> index f8fdd68..ca80b12 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.c
> @@ -207,6 +207,20 @@ struct rte_flow_desc_data {
> return -rte_errno;
> }
>
> +static void
> +flow_lock(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> +{
> + if (!(dev->data->dev_flags &
> RTE_ETH_DEV_FLOW_OPS_THREAD_SAFE))
> + pthread_mutex_lock(&dev->data->fts_mutex);
> +}
Why not inline function?
Also I don't think you should check the PMD support in this function
when this function is called it should lock.
> +
> +static void
> +flow_unlock(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> +{
> + if (!(dev->data->dev_flags &
> RTE_ETH_DEV_FLOW_OPS_THREAD_SAFE))
> + pthread_mutex_unlock(&dev->data->fts_mutex);
> +}
Same comments as above.
> +
> static int
> flow_err(uint16_t port_id, int ret, struct rte_flow_error *error)
> {
> @@ -346,12 +360,16 @@ struct rte_flow_desc_data {
> {
> const struct rte_flow_ops *ops = rte_flow_ops_get(port_id, error);
> struct rte_eth_dev *dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
> + int ret;
>
> if (unlikely(!ops))
> return -rte_errno;
> - if (likely(!!ops->validate))
> - return flow_err(port_id, ops->validate(dev, attr, pattern,
> - actions, error), error);
> + if (likely(!!ops->validate)) {
> + flow_lock(dev);
> + ret = ops->validate(dev, attr, pattern, actions, error);
> + flow_unlock(dev);
> + return flow_err(port_id, ret, error);
> + }
> return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOSYS,
> RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
> NULL, rte_strerror(ENOSYS));
> @@ -372,7 +390,9 @@ struct rte_flow *
> if (unlikely(!ops))
> return NULL;
> if (likely(!!ops->create)) {
> + flow_lock(dev);
> flow = ops->create(dev, attr, pattern, actions, error);
> + flow_unlock(dev);
> if (flow == NULL)
> flow_err(port_id, -rte_errno, error);
> return flow;
> @@ -390,12 +410,16 @@ struct rte_flow *
> {
> struct rte_eth_dev *dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
> const struct rte_flow_ops *ops = rte_flow_ops_get(port_id, error);
> + int ret;
>
> if (unlikely(!ops))
> return -rte_errno;
> - if (likely(!!ops->destroy))
> - return flow_err(port_id, ops->destroy(dev, flow, error),
> - error);
> + if (likely(!!ops->destroy)) {
> + flow_lock(dev);
> + ret = ops->destroy(dev, flow, error);
> + flow_unlock(dev);
> + return flow_err(port_id, ret, error);
> + }
> return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOSYS,
> RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
> NULL, rte_strerror(ENOSYS));
> @@ -408,11 +432,16 @@ struct rte_flow *
> {
> struct rte_eth_dev *dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
> const struct rte_flow_ops *ops = rte_flow_ops_get(port_id, error);
> + int ret;
>
> if (unlikely(!ops))
> return -rte_errno;
> - if (likely(!!ops->flush))
> - return flow_err(port_id, ops->flush(dev, error), error);
> + if (likely(!!ops->flush)) {
> + flow_lock(dev);
> + ret = ops->flush(dev, error);
> + flow_unlock(dev);
> + return flow_err(port_id, ret, error);
> + }
> return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOSYS,
> RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
> NULL, rte_strerror(ENOSYS));
> @@ -428,12 +457,16 @@ struct rte_flow *
> {
> struct rte_eth_dev *dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
> const struct rte_flow_ops *ops = rte_flow_ops_get(port_id, error);
> + int ret;
>
> if (!ops)
> return -rte_errno;
> - if (likely(!!ops->query))
> - return flow_err(port_id, ops->query(dev, flow, action, data,
> - error), error);
> + if (likely(!!ops->query)) {
> + flow_lock(dev);
> + ret = ops->query(dev, flow, action, data, error);
> + flow_unlock(dev);
> + return flow_err(port_id, ret, error);
> + }
> return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOSYS,
> RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
> NULL, rte_strerror(ENOSYS));
> @@ -447,11 +480,16 @@ struct rte_flow *
> {
> struct rte_eth_dev *dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
> const struct rte_flow_ops *ops = rte_flow_ops_get(port_id, error);
> + int ret;
>
> if (!ops)
> return -rte_errno;
> - if (likely(!!ops->isolate))
> - return flow_err(port_id, ops->isolate(dev, set, error), error);
> + if (likely(!!ops->isolate)) {
> + flow_lock(dev);
> + ret = ops->isolate(dev, set, error);
> + flow_unlock(dev);
> + return flow_err(port_id, ret, error);
> + }
> return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOSYS,
> RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
> NULL, rte_strerror(ENOSYS));
> @@ -1224,12 +1262,16 @@ enum rte_flow_conv_item_spec_type {
> {
> struct rte_eth_dev *dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
> const struct rte_flow_ops *ops = rte_flow_ops_get(port_id, error);
> + int ret;
>
> if (unlikely(!ops))
> return -rte_errno;
> - if (likely(!!ops->dev_dump))
> - return flow_err(port_id, ops->dev_dump(dev, file, error),
> - error);
> + if (likely(!!ops->dev_dump)) {
> + flow_lock(dev);
> + ret = ops->dev_dump(dev, file, error);
> + flow_unlock(dev);
> + return flow_err(port_id, ret, error);
> + }
> return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOSYS,
> RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
> NULL, rte_strerror(ENOSYS));
> @@ -1241,12 +1283,16 @@ enum rte_flow_conv_item_spec_type {
> {
> struct rte_eth_dev *dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
> const struct rte_flow_ops *ops = rte_flow_ops_get(port_id, error);
> + int ret;
>
> if (unlikely(!ops))
> return -rte_errno;
> - if (likely(!!ops->get_aged_flows))
> - return flow_err(port_id, ops->get_aged_flows(dev, contexts,
> - nb_contexts, error), error);
> + if (likely(!!ops->get_aged_flows)) {
> + flow_lock(dev);
> + ret = ops->get_aged_flows(dev, contexts, nb_contexts, error);
> + flow_unlock(dev);
> + return flow_err(port_id, ret, error);
> + }
> return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
> RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
> NULL, rte_strerror(ENOTSUP));
> --
> 1.8.3.1
