On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 3:30 AM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com> wrote:

> On 7/24/2020 6:32 AM, Ajit Khaparde wrote:
> > From: Kishore Padmanabha <kishore.padmana...@broadcom.com>
> >
> > This is a work around for the OVS setting offload rules that
> > are passing vlan priority mask as wild card and currently we
> > do not support it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kishore Padmanabha <kishore.padmana...@broadcom.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Michael Baucom <michael.bau...@broadcom.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/bnxt/tf_ulp/ulp_rte_parser.c | 9 +++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/bnxt/tf_ulp/ulp_rte_parser.c
> b/drivers/net/bnxt/tf_ulp/ulp_rte_parser.c
> > index 67f9319d6..665f5d381 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/bnxt/tf_ulp/ulp_rte_parser.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/bnxt/tf_ulp/ulp_rte_parser.c
> > @@ -709,8 +709,17 @@ ulp_rte_vlan_hdr_handler(const struct rte_flow_item
> *item,
> >                       vlan_tag |= ~ULP_VLAN_TAG_MASK;
> >               vlan_tag = htons(vlan_tag);
> >
> > +#ifdef ULP_DONT_IGNORE_TOS
> >               ulp_rte_prsr_mask_copy(params, &idx, &priority,
> >                                      sizeof(priority));
> > +#else
> > +             /*
> > +              * The priority field is ignored since OVS is setting it as
> > +              * wild card match and it is not supported. This is a work
> > +              * around and shall be addressed in the future.
> > +              */
> > +             idx += 1;
> > +#endif
> >               ulp_rte_prsr_mask_copy(params, &idx, &vlan_tag,
> >                                      sizeof(vlan_tag));
> >               ulp_rte_prsr_mask_copy(params, &idx,
> &vlan_mask->inner_type,
> >
>
> Hi Ajit,
>
> What sets the 'ULP_DONT_IGNORE_TOS', I don't see it in our build system.
> If ways
> 'else' leg is taken, why not drop the macro completely?
>
Ferruh,
Yes. I will submit a v4 to take care of that.

Thanks
Ajit

Reply via email to