On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 3:30 AM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com> wrote:
> On 7/24/2020 6:32 AM, Ajit Khaparde wrote: > > From: Kishore Padmanabha <kishore.padmana...@broadcom.com> > > > > This is a work around for the OVS setting offload rules that > > are passing vlan priority mask as wild card and currently we > > do not support it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Kishore Padmanabha <kishore.padmana...@broadcom.com> > > Reviewed-by: Michael Baucom <michael.bau...@broadcom.com> > > --- > > drivers/net/bnxt/tf_ulp/ulp_rte_parser.c | 9 +++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/bnxt/tf_ulp/ulp_rte_parser.c > b/drivers/net/bnxt/tf_ulp/ulp_rte_parser.c > > index 67f9319d6..665f5d381 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/bnxt/tf_ulp/ulp_rte_parser.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/bnxt/tf_ulp/ulp_rte_parser.c > > @@ -709,8 +709,17 @@ ulp_rte_vlan_hdr_handler(const struct rte_flow_item > *item, > > vlan_tag |= ~ULP_VLAN_TAG_MASK; > > vlan_tag = htons(vlan_tag); > > > > +#ifdef ULP_DONT_IGNORE_TOS > > ulp_rte_prsr_mask_copy(params, &idx, &priority, > > sizeof(priority)); > > +#else > > + /* > > + * The priority field is ignored since OVS is setting it as > > + * wild card match and it is not supported. This is a work > > + * around and shall be addressed in the future. > > + */ > > + idx += 1; > > +#endif > > ulp_rte_prsr_mask_copy(params, &idx, &vlan_tag, > > sizeof(vlan_tag)); > > ulp_rte_prsr_mask_copy(params, &idx, > &vlan_mask->inner_type, > > > > Hi Ajit, > > What sets the 'ULP_DONT_IGNORE_TOS', I don't see it in our build system. > If ways > 'else' leg is taken, why not drop the macro completely? > Ferruh, Yes. I will submit a v4 to take care of that. Thanks Ajit