Hi Ferruh,

Please see inline.

Thanks
Tejasree

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>
> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2020 5:33 PM
> To: Tejasree Kondoj <ktejas...@marvell.com>; Akhil Goyal
> <akhil.go...@nxp.com>; Radu Nicolau <radu.nico...@intel.com>
> Cc: Vamsi Krishna Attunuru <vattun...@marvell.com>; Narayana Prasad
> Raju Athreya <pathr...@marvell.com>; Anoob Joseph
> <ano...@marvell.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Thomas Monjalon
> <tho...@monjalon.net>
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 8/8] crypto/octeontx2: add
> cryptodev sec enqueue and dequeue routines
> 
> External Email
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> On 7/16/2020 9:39 AM, Tejasree Kondoj wrote:
> > From: Vamsi Attunuru <vattun...@marvell.com>
> >
> > This patch adds lookaside IPsec enqueue and dequeue routines.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vamsi Attunuru <vattun...@marvell.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Tejasree Kondoj <ktejas...@marvell.com>
> 
> <...>
> 
> > @@ -33,6 +34,13 @@ struct otx2_cpt_vf {
> >     /**< CPT device capabilities */
> >  };
> >
> > +struct cpt_meta_info {
> > +   uint64_t deq_op_info[4];
> > +   uint64_t comp_code_sz;
> > +   union cpt_res_s cpt_res __rte_aligned(16);
> > +   struct cpt_request_info cpt_req __rte_aligned(8); };
> 
> "struct cpt_request_info" already has cache size alignment
> (__rte_cache_aligned) [1].
> 
> Trying to align it to 8 bytes is reducing the alignment, gcc & clang seems
> silently ignoring this case but icc is giving a warning.
> 
> Since it is already ignored, and I assume the real intention is not to reduce
> the alignment, can you please remove the above "__rte_aligned(8)"?
[Tejasree] 'struct cpt_request_info' need not be cache aligned. It will need to 
be aligned 
to 8 bytes as used in this patch. Will replace __rte_cache_aligned of 'struct 
cpt_request_info' 
with __rte_aligned(8) and remove above __rte_aligned(8). Will submit separate 
patch 
as a fix and mention commit id of merged patch (fab634eb87ca) in fixes section.
Would that be fine?
> 
> 
> @Thomas, it is still good to have icc around to catch additional issues ;)
> 
> 
> [1]
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-
> 3A__lxr.dpdk.org_dpdk_v20.05_source_drivers_common_cpt_cpt-
> 5Fcommon.h-
> 23L79&d=DwIDaQ&c=nKjWec2b6R0mOyPaz7xtfQ&r=NjpqGUAf6Xc0ZLzxCvv4i
> df8zRFeSJHioNlG1Wif1Gs&m=KNBzM9j6nc00ue4kkISJLVTLpkDGjg4A4dUjIVFz
> Rps&s=Q0RPHY0v3g5f0uOh9vv7SKb61aQuQB2RhCDLiOtLZ7s&e=

Reply via email to