On 7/16/20 5:31 AM, Xia, Chenbo wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Adrian Moreno <amore...@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2020 1:18 AM
>> To: dev@dpdk.org
>> Cc: maxime.coque...@redhat.com; Wang, Zhihong <zhihong.w...@intel.com>;
>> amore...@redhat.com; Xia, Chenbo <chenbo....@intel.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH 4/5] net/virtio: add GET_STATUS support to virtio-user
>>
>> This patch adds support for VHOST_USER_GET_STATUS request.
>>
>> Only vhost-user backed is supported for now
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Adrian Moreno <amore...@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/vhost_user.c   |  2 +
>>  .../net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.c  | 39
>> +++++++++++++++++++  .../net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.h  |  1 +
>>  drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user_ethdev.c       |  2 +
>>  4 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/vhost_user.c
>> b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/vhost_user.c
>> index 2332e01d1..43c630e47 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/vhost_user.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/vhost_user.c
>> @@ -279,6 +279,7 @@ vhost_user_sock(struct virtio_user_dev *dev,
>>      switch (req) {
>>      case VHOST_USER_GET_FEATURES:
>>      case VHOST_USER_GET_PROTOCOL_FEATURES:
>> +    case VHOST_USER_GET_STATUS:
>>              need_reply = 1;
>>              break;
>>
>> @@ -373,6 +374,7 @@ vhost_user_sock(struct virtio_user_dev *dev,
>>
>>              switch (req) {
>>              case VHOST_USER_GET_FEATURES:
>> +            case VHOST_USER_GET_STATUS:
>>              case VHOST_USER_GET_PROTOCOL_FEATURES:
>>                      if (msg.size != sizeof(m.payload.u64)) {
>>                              PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Received bad msg size");
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.c
>> b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.c
>> index 2c400a448..613caef56 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.c
>> @@ -804,3 +804,42 @@ virtio_user_send_status_update(struct virtio_user_dev
>> *dev, uint8_t status)
>>
>>      return 0;
>>  }
>> +
>> +int
>> +virtio_user_update_status(struct virtio_user_dev *dev) {
>> +    uint64_t ret;
>> +
>> +    /* Vhost-user only for now */
>> +    if (!is_vhost_user_by_type(dev->path))
>> +            return 0;
>> +
>> +    if (!(dev->protocol_features & (1UL <<
>> VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_STATUS)))
>> +            return 0;
>> +
>> +    if (dev->ops->send_request(dev, VHOST_USER_GET_STATUS, &ret) < 0) {
>> +            PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "GET_STATUS failed: %s", strerror(errno));
>> +            return -1;
>> +    }
>> +    if (ret > UINT8_MAX) {
>> +            PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "Invalid VHOST_USER_GET_STATUS
>> response 0x%" PRIx64 "\n", ret);
> 
> There's a coding style issue here:
> CHECK:CAMELCASE: Avoid CamelCase: <PRIx64>
> Could you fix this?

I did see this one as well. It also seems new because PRIx64 is widely used in 
DPDK.

find -iname *.c | xargs grep -i "PRIx64" | wc -l
520

So, ether we have to modify the script to ignore this one or change all 520
cases, right?

+ David, what do you think?

> 
> Btw, in case you don't know, there's a script in dpdk for check these issues:
> devtools/checkpatches.sh. 😊
> 
> Thanks!
> Chenbo
> 
>> +            return -1;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    dev->status = ret;
>> +    PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "Updated Device Status(0x%08x):\n"
>> +                    "\t-ACKNOWLEDGE: %u\n"
>> +                    "\t-DRIVER: %u\n"
>> +                    "\t-DRIVER_OK: %u\n"
>> +                    "\t-FEATURES_OK: %u\n"
>> +                    "\t-DEVICE_NEED_RESET: %u\n"
>> +                    "\t-FAILED: %u\n",
>> +                    dev->status,
>> +                    !!(dev->status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_STATUS_ACK),
>> +                    !!(dev->status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_STATUS_DRIVER),
>> +                    !!(dev->status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_STATUS_DRIVER_OK),
>> +                    !!(dev->status &
>> VIRTIO_CONFIG_STATUS_FEATURES_OK),
>> +                    !!(dev->status &
>> VIRTIO_CONFIG_STATUS_DEV_NEED_RESET),
>> +                    !!(dev->status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_STATUS_FAILED));
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.h
>> b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.h
>> index a76d7cfaf..1a045af6f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.h
>> @@ -75,4 +75,5 @@ void virtio_user_handle_cq_packed(struct virtio_user_dev
>> *dev,
>>                                uint16_t queue_idx);
>>  uint8_t virtio_user_handle_mq(struct virtio_user_dev *dev, uint16_t 
>> q_pairs);
>> int virtio_user_send_status_update(struct virtio_user_dev *dev, uint8_t 
>> status);
>> +int virtio_user_update_status(struct virtio_user_dev *dev);
>>  #endif
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user_ethdev.c
>> b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user_ethdev.c
>> index e52f11341..40330deed 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user_ethdev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user_ethdev.c
>> @@ -281,6 +281,8 @@ virtio_user_get_status(struct virtio_hw *hw)  {
>>      struct virtio_user_dev *dev = virtio_user_get_dev(hw);
>>
>> +    virtio_user_update_status(dev);
>> +
>>      return dev->status;
>>  }
>>
>> --
>> 2.26.2
> 

-- 
Adrián Moreno

Reply via email to