Hi, ferruh > -----Original Message----- > From: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yi...@intel.com> > Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2020 12:51 AM > To: i.dyu...@samsung.com; dev@dpdk.org; v.kurams...@samsung.com; > tho...@monjalon.net; david.march...@redhat.com; > arybche...@solarflare.com; Zhao1, Wei <wei.zh...@intel.com>; Guo, Jia > <jia....@intel.com>; Xing, Beilei <beilei.x...@intel.com>; Yang, Qiming > <qiming.y...@intel.com>; Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo...@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] net/ixgbe: return unknown speed in status > > On 6/15/2020 10:01 AM, Ivan Dyukov wrote: > > rte_ethdev has declared new NUM_UNKNOWN speed which could be used in > > case when no speed information is available > > > > Signed-off-by: Ivan Dyukov <i.dyu...@samsung.com> > > --- > > drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 6 +----- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c > > b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c > > index a4e5c539d..5b9b13058 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c > > @@ -4311,11 +4311,7 @@ ixgbe_dev_link_update_share(struct > rte_eth_dev *dev, > > switch (link_speed) { > > default: > > case IXGBE_LINK_SPEED_UNKNOWN: > > - if (hw->device_id == IXGBE_DEV_ID_X550EM_A_1G_T || > > - hw->device_id == IXGBE_DEV_ID_X550EM_A_1G_T_L) > > - link.link_speed = ETH_SPEED_NUM_10M; > > - else > > - link.link_speed = ETH_SPEED_NUM_100M;
For ixgbe x553(IXGBE_DEV_ID_X550EM_A_1G_T), we must do some adaption, we can not delete these specific code for the kind of ixgbe nic. > > + link.link_speed = ETH_SPEED_NUM_UNKNOWN; > > break; > > > > case IXGBE_LINK_SPEED_100_FULL: > > > > looks good to me.