Hi, ferruh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2020 12:51 AM
> To: i.dyu...@samsung.com; dev@dpdk.org; v.kurams...@samsung.com;
> tho...@monjalon.net; david.march...@redhat.com;
> arybche...@solarflare.com; Zhao1, Wei <wei.zh...@intel.com>; Guo, Jia
> <jia....@intel.com>; Xing, Beilei <beilei.x...@intel.com>; Yang, Qiming
> <qiming.y...@intel.com>; Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo...@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] net/ixgbe: return unknown speed in status
> 
> On 6/15/2020 10:01 AM, Ivan Dyukov wrote:
> > rte_ethdev has declared new NUM_UNKNOWN speed which could be used in
> > case when no speed information is available
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ivan Dyukov <i.dyu...@samsung.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 6 +-----
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> > b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> > index a4e5c539d..5b9b13058 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> > @@ -4311,11 +4311,7 @@ ixgbe_dev_link_update_share(struct
> rte_eth_dev *dev,
> >     switch (link_speed) {
> >     default:
> >     case IXGBE_LINK_SPEED_UNKNOWN:
> > -           if (hw->device_id == IXGBE_DEV_ID_X550EM_A_1G_T ||
> > -                   hw->device_id == IXGBE_DEV_ID_X550EM_A_1G_T_L)
> > -                   link.link_speed = ETH_SPEED_NUM_10M;
> > -           else
> > -                   link.link_speed = ETH_SPEED_NUM_100M;

For ixgbe x553(IXGBE_DEV_ID_X550EM_A_1G_T),  we must do some adaption, we can 
not delete these specific code for the kind of ixgbe nic.


> > +           link.link_speed = ETH_SPEED_NUM_UNKNOWN;
> >             break;



> >
> >     case IXGBE_LINK_SPEED_100_FULL:
> >
> 
> looks good to me.

Reply via email to