Fine. Is there another location or option to save this information? Regards, Liron
-----Original Message----- From: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org> Sent: Wednesday, 6 May 2020 22:43 To: Liron Himi <lir...@marvell.com> Cc: dpdk-dev <dev@dpdk.org> Subject: [EXT] Re: [dpdk-dev] input port in mbuf External Email ---------------------------------------------------------------------- On Wed, 6 May 2020 19:21:30 +0000 Liron Himi <lir...@marvell.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We need to save the input port in the mbuf in order to return the buffer to > the right hw pool. > For now we use the 'port' in the mbuf as it is supposed to be for this exact > purpose. > But we noticed that some applications are override it with the destination > port. > > What should be the right behavior? > is there another location that that this information can be stored and read > only by the ethdev drivers? > > Regards, > Liron > There is no requirement that input port is unmodified by the application.