>-----Original Message----- >From: dev <dev-boun...@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Sunil Kumar Kori >Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 9:30 PM >To: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com> >Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jer...@marvell.com>; dev <dev@dpdk.org>; >Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org> >Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] bus/pci: optimise scanning >with whitelist/blacklist > >Sent from Workspace ONE Boxer >On 17-Apr-2020 9:06 PM, David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com> >wrote: >> >> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 5:12 PM Sunil Kumar Kori <sk...@marvell.com> >wrote: >> > >Your current patch is a no go anyway. >> > >The __rte_experimental tagging makes no sense. >> > >> > That’s not a problem. My only intention is to resolve a problem >> > what we have observed and corresponding fix caters a practical use case. >> > If you don’t like the way it is implemented then we can go with your >suggested way. >> > Please let me know, will you be sending that github patch or should I send >? >> >> And again. >> The experimental tag is *useless*. >> private.h is not exported to users, the symbol you want to add is >> internal to the pci bus library. >> >> I will stop at this. >> >Got it. If it's only about exporting the symbol to the user then I will send >next >version of my patch after removing __rte_experimental and will make symbol >to internal.
Uploaded v3. >> >> -- >> David Marchand >>
