On 4/6/2020 12:05 PM, Dekel Peled wrote:
> Hi Ferruh,
>
> Is this patch ready to be applied in next-net?
Hi Dekel,
Most probably I can check it today..
>
> Regards,
> Dekel
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dekel Peled <dek...@mellanox.com>
>> Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2020 12:21 PM
>> To: wenzhuo...@intel.com; jingjing...@intel.com;
>> bernard.iremon...@intel.com
>> Cc: Matan Azrad <ma...@mellanox.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Ori Kam
>> <or...@mellanox.com>
>> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: enhance GTP support
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Can this patch be applied?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dekel
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Ori Kam <or...@mellanox.com>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 10:28 AM
>>> To: Dekel Peled <dek...@mellanox.com>; wenzhuo...@intel.com;
>>> jingjing...@intel.com; bernard.iremon...@intel.com
>>> Cc: Matan Azrad <ma...@mellanox.com>; dev@dpdk.org
>>> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: enhance GTP support
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: dev <dev-boun...@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Dekel Peled
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 10:13 AM
>>>> To: Ori Kam <or...@mellanox.com>; wenzhuo...@intel.com;
>>>> jingjing...@intel.com; bernard.iremon...@intel.com
>>>> Cc: Matan Azrad <ma...@mellanox.com>; dev@dpdk.org
>>>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: enhance GTP support
>>>>
>>>> This patch adds CLI option to enter the v_pt_rsv_flags value for GTP
>>>> flow pattern item.
>>>> It also adds GTP as valid item in raw_encap and raw_decap setting.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dekel Peled <dek...@mellanox.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> v2: remove redundant hton flag.
>>>> ---
>>>> app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
>>>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
>>>> b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c index a781545..4877ac6 100644
>>>> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
>>>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
>>>> @@ -170,6 +170,7 @@ enum index {
>>>> ITEM_FUZZY,
>>>> ITEM_FUZZY_THRESH,
>>>> ITEM_GTP,
>>>> + ITEM_GTP_FLAGS,
>>>> ITEM_GTP_MSG_TYPE,
>>>> ITEM_GTP_TEID,
>>>> ITEM_GTPC,
>>>> @@ -938,6 +939,7 @@ struct parse_action_priv { };
>>>>
>>>> static const enum index item_gtp[] = {
>>>> + ITEM_GTP_FLAGS,
>>>> ITEM_GTP_MSG_TYPE,
>>>> ITEM_GTP_TEID,
>>>> ITEM_NEXT,
>>>> @@ -2347,12 +2349,18 @@ static int comp_set_raw_index(struct context
>>>> *, const struct token *,
>>>> .next = NEXT(item_gtp),
>>>> .call = parse_vc,
>>>> },
>>>> + [ITEM_GTP_FLAGS] = {
>>>> + .name = "v_pt_rsv_flags",
>>>> + .help = "GTP flags",
>>>> + .next = NEXT(item_gtp, NEXT_ENTRY(UNSIGNED),
>>>> item_param),
>>>> + .args = ARGS(ARGS_ENTRY(struct rte_flow_item_gtp,
>>>> + v_pt_rsv_flags)),
>>>> + },
>>>> [ITEM_GTP_MSG_TYPE] = {
>>>> .name = "msg_type",
>>>> .help = "GTP message type",
>>>> .next = NEXT(item_gtp, NEXT_ENTRY(UNSIGNED),
>>> item_param),
>>>> - .args = ARGS(ARGS_ENTRY_HTON(struct rte_flow_item_gtp,
>>>> - msg_type)),
>>>> + .args = ARGS(ARGS_ENTRY(struct rte_flow_item_gtp,
>>>> msg_type)),
>>>> },
>>>> [ITEM_GTP_TEID] = {
>>>> .name = "teid",
>>>> @@ -6604,6 +6612,9 @@ static int comp_set_raw_index(struct context
>>>> *, const struct token *,
>>>> size = sizeof(struct rte_flow_item_ah);
>>>> proto = 0x33;
>>>> break;
>>>> + case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_GTP:
>>>> + size = sizeof(struct rte_flow_item_gtp);
>>>> + break;
>>>> case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_PFCP:
>>>> size = sizeof(struct rte_flow_item_pfcp);
>>>> break;
>>>> --
>>>> 1.8.3.1
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Ori Kam <or...@mellanox.com> Thanks, Ori
