Hi,

Can this patch be applied?

Regards,
Dekel

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ori Kam <or...@mellanox.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 10:28 AM
> To: Dekel Peled <dek...@mellanox.com>; wenzhuo...@intel.com;
> jingjing...@intel.com; bernard.iremon...@intel.com
> Cc: Matan Azrad <ma...@mellanox.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: enhance GTP support
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev <dev-boun...@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Dekel Peled
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 10:13 AM
> > To: Ori Kam <or...@mellanox.com>; wenzhuo...@intel.com;
> > jingjing...@intel.com; bernard.iremon...@intel.com
> > Cc: Matan Azrad <ma...@mellanox.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: enhance GTP support
> >
> > This patch adds CLI option to enter the v_pt_rsv_flags value for GTP
> > flow pattern item.
> > It also adds GTP as valid item in raw_encap and raw_decap setting.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dekel Peled <dek...@mellanox.com>
> > ---
> > v2: remove redundant hton flag.
> > ---
> >  app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
> > index a781545..4877ac6 100644
> > --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
> > +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
> > @@ -170,6 +170,7 @@ enum index {
> >     ITEM_FUZZY,
> >     ITEM_FUZZY_THRESH,
> >     ITEM_GTP,
> > +   ITEM_GTP_FLAGS,
> >     ITEM_GTP_MSG_TYPE,
> >     ITEM_GTP_TEID,
> >     ITEM_GTPC,
> > @@ -938,6 +939,7 @@ struct parse_action_priv {  };
> >
> >  static const enum index item_gtp[] = {
> > +   ITEM_GTP_FLAGS,
> >     ITEM_GTP_MSG_TYPE,
> >     ITEM_GTP_TEID,
> >     ITEM_NEXT,
> > @@ -2347,12 +2349,18 @@ static int comp_set_raw_index(struct context
> > *, const struct token *,
> >             .next = NEXT(item_gtp),
> >             .call = parse_vc,
> >     },
> > +   [ITEM_GTP_FLAGS] = {
> > +           .name = "v_pt_rsv_flags",
> > +           .help = "GTP flags",
> > +           .next = NEXT(item_gtp, NEXT_ENTRY(UNSIGNED),
> > item_param),
> > +           .args = ARGS(ARGS_ENTRY(struct rte_flow_item_gtp,
> > +                                   v_pt_rsv_flags)),
> > +   },
> >     [ITEM_GTP_MSG_TYPE] = {
> >             .name = "msg_type",
> >             .help = "GTP message type",
> >             .next = NEXT(item_gtp, NEXT_ENTRY(UNSIGNED),
> item_param),
> > -           .args = ARGS(ARGS_ENTRY_HTON(struct rte_flow_item_gtp,
> > -                                        msg_type)),
> > +           .args = ARGS(ARGS_ENTRY(struct rte_flow_item_gtp,
> > msg_type)),
> >     },
> >     [ITEM_GTP_TEID] = {
> >             .name = "teid",
> > @@ -6604,6 +6612,9 @@ static int comp_set_raw_index(struct context *,
> > const struct token *,
> >                     size = sizeof(struct rte_flow_item_ah);
> >                     proto = 0x33;
> >                     break;
> > +           case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_GTP:
> > +                   size = sizeof(struct rte_flow_item_gtp);
> > +                   break;
> >             case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_PFCP:
> >                     size = sizeof(struct rte_flow_item_pfcp);
> >                     break;
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
> 
> Acked-by: Ori Kam <or...@mellanox.com>
> Thanks,
> Ori

Reply via email to