On 2015/02/19 20:17, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >> @@ -152,6 +159,7 @@ struct rte_pci_device { >> uint16_t max_vfs; /**< sriov enable if not zero */ >> int numa_node; /**< NUMA node connection */ >> struct rte_devargs *devargs; /**< Device user arguments */ >> + enum rte_pt_driver pt_driver; /**< Driver of passthrough */ > [...] >> +static int >> +pci_get_kernel_driver_by_path(const char *filename, char *dri_name) > I think "kernel driver" is a good name. Why not using this name in the > pci_device struct to be more consistent?
Hi Michael, Could you please let me know what do you think about it? Thanks Tetsuya > Thanks