On 2015/02/19 20:17, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>> @@ -152,6 +159,7 @@ struct rte_pci_device {
>>      uint16_t max_vfs;                       /**< sriov enable if not zero */
>>      int numa_node;                          /**< NUMA node connection */
>>      struct rte_devargs *devargs;            /**< Device user arguments */
>> +    enum rte_pt_driver pt_driver;           /**< Driver of passthrough */
> [...]
>> +static int
>> +pci_get_kernel_driver_by_path(const char *filename, char *dri_name)
> I think "kernel driver" is a good name. Why not using this name in the
> pci_device struct to be more consistent?

Hi Michael,

Could you please let me know what do you think about it?

Thanks
Tetsuya

> Thanks

Reply via email to