On 2015/02/18 9:31, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-02-17 15:14, Tetsuya Mukawa: >> On 2015/02/17 9:36, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >>> 2015-02-16 13:14, Tetsuya Mukawa: >>> Is uint8_t sill a good size for hotpluggable virtual device ids? >> I am not sure it's enough, but uint8_t is widely used in "rte_ethdev.c" >> as port id. >> If someone reports it doesn't enough, I guess it will be the time to >> write a patch to change all uint_8 in one patch. > It's a big ABI breakage. So if we feel it's going to be required, > it's better to do it now in 2.0 release I think. > > Any opinion? >
Hi Thomas, I agree with it. I will add an one more patch to change uint8_t to uint16_t. Thanks, Tetsuya
