2015-02-17 15:14, Tetsuya Mukawa: > On 2015/02/17 9:36, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 2015-02-16 13:14, Tetsuya Mukawa: > > Is uint8_t sill a good size for hotpluggable virtual device ids? > > I am not sure it's enough, but uint8_t is widely used in "rte_ethdev.c" > as port id. > If someone reports it doesn't enough, I guess it will be the time to > write a patch to change all uint_8 in one patch.
It's a big ABI breakage. So if we feel it's going to be required, it's better to do it now in 2.0 release I think. Any opinion?
