On 10/03/2020 4:24 PM, Anoob Joseph wrote:
Hi Praveen,
[Anoob] Rather than calling PMD specific functions from all applications, it
might be better to introduce the same via 'devargs' to the PMD.
[Praveen Shetty] We will investigate further on this.
Probably let's converge on this before sending v2. I don't think we should add
a new option just specific to one PMD. Devargs already provides the required
framework and other PMDs are already using it.
I agree this would be better handled by driver specific devargs
@Konstatin, @Akhil,
What is your take on this?
Thanks,
Anoob
-----Original Message-----
From: Shetty, Praveen <praveen.she...@intel.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2020 5:11 PM
To: Anoob Joseph <ano...@marvell.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Doherty, Declan
<declan.dohe...@intel.com>; Iremonger, Bernard
<bernard.iremon...@intel.com>; Ananyev, Konstantin
<konstantin.anan...@intel.com>
Subject: [EXT] RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] examples/ipsec-secgw: load/unload
esp-ah DDP file
...
--
2.17.1
