On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 6:36 PM Bruce Richardson <bruce.richard...@intel.com> wrote: > > > > So, Probably it good to have native CTF emitter in DPDK and reuse all > > open-source trace viewer(babeltrace and TraceCompass) and format(CTF) > > infrastructure. > > I think, it would be best of both world. > > > > Any thoughts on this subject? Based on the community feedback, I can work > > on the patch for v20.05. > > Forgive my ignorance of LTTng, but is there the concept of > enabling/disabling the trace points? If so, the overhead you refer to, that > is presumably with the trace enabled?
Yes this is when trace is enabled. If the trace is disabled then it will be the only a handful of cycles. > /Bruce
