Hi Ori,

<snip>

> > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 01/10] app/testpmd: parse flow
> > command line for ESP
> >
> > Hi Ori,
> >
> > Thanks for the review.
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 01/10] app/testpmd: parse flow
> > > command line for ESP
> > >
> > > Hi just small comment inside.
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ori
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: dev <dev-boun...@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Bernard Iremonger
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2019 12:16 PM
> > > > To: dev@dpdk.org; beilei.x...@intel.com; qi.z.zh...@intel.com;
> > > > declan.dohe...@intel.com
> > > > Cc: konstantin.anan...@intel.com; bernard.iremon...@intel.com
> > > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 01/10] app/testpmd: parse flow
> > command
> > > > line for ESP
> > > >
> > > > add ITEM_ESP
> > > > add ITEM_ESP_SPI
> > > > add debug to cmdline_flow.c
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremon...@intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c | 37
> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > > >  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c b/app/test-
> > pmd/cmdline_flow.c
> > > > index 99dade7..f1b0610 100644
> > > > --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
> > > > +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
> > > > @@ -213,6 +213,8 @@ enum index {
> > > >         ITEM_TAG,
> > > >         ITEM_TAG_DATA,
> > > >         ITEM_TAG_INDEX,
> > > > +       ITEM_ESP,
> > > > +       ITEM_ESP_SPI,
> > > >
> > > >         /* Validate/create actions. */
> > > >         ACTIONS,
> > > > @@ -746,6 +748,7 @@ static const enum index next_item[] = {
> > > >         ITEM_PPPOE_PROTO_ID,
> > > >         ITEM_HIGIG2,
> > > >         ITEM_TAG,
> > > > +       ITEM_ESP,
> > > >         END_SET,
> > > >         ZERO,
> > > >  };
> > > > @@ -1017,6 +1020,12 @@ static const enum index item_higig2[] = {
> > > >         ZERO,
> > > >  };
> > > >
> > > > +static const enum index item_esp[] = {
> > > > +       ITEM_ESP_SPI,
> > > > +       ITEM_NEXT,
> > > > +       ZERO,
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > >  static const enum index next_set_raw[] = {
> > > >         SET_RAW_INDEX,
> > > >         ITEM_ETH,
> > > > @@ -2593,6 +2602,20 @@ static const struct token token_list[] = {
> > > >                              NEXT_ENTRY(ITEM_PARAM_IS)),
> > > >                 .args = ARGS(ARGS_ENTRY(struct rte_flow_item_tag,
> > > index)),
> > > >         },
> > > > +       [ITEM_ESP] = {
> > > > +               .name = "esp",
> > > > +               .help = "match ESP header",
> > > > +               .priv = PRIV_ITEM(ESP, sizeof(struct 
> > > > rte_flow_item_esp)),
> > > > +               .next = NEXT(item_esp),
> > > > +               .call = parse_vc,
> > > > +       },
> > > > +       [ITEM_ESP_SPI] = {
> > > > +               .name = "spi",
> > > > +               .help = "security policy index",
> > > > +               .next = NEXT(item_esp, NEXT_ENTRY(UNSIGNED),
> > > > item_param),
> > > > +               .args = ARGS(ARGS_ENTRY_HTON(struct rte_flow_item_esp,
> > > > +                               hdr.spi)),
> > > > +       },
> > > >         /* Validate/create actions. */
> > > >         [ACTIONS] = {
> > > >                 .name = "actions",
> > > > @@ -6052,6 +6075,9 @@ cmd_flow_tok(cmdline_parse_token_hdr_t
> > > **hdr,
> > > > static void  cmd_flow_parsed(const struct buffer *in)  {
> > > > +       printf("Flow command line parsed successfully for
> > > > command=%d.\n",
> > > > +                       in->command);
> > > > +
> > >
> > > Why adding this printf?
> >
> > It is useful to know that the parsing of the flow command line is
> > successful before going into the PMD code.
> > I will remove in the v3 if you think it is too verbose.
> >
> 
> I think it is to verbose, due to the fact that in normal case the parsing will
> succeed, Which means there will be a lot of print (In our testing we can have
> more then 200K commands).
> So I prefer to remove it, but if you think it is critical you can use the
> verbose_level with high value.
> If you remove it feel free to add my ack on v3.

I will remove it and add your ack in v3.


> > >
> > > >         switch (in->command) {
> > > >         case VALIDATE:
> > > >                 port_flow_validate(in->port, &in->args.vc.attr, @@ 
> > > > -6230,14
> > > > +6256,15 @@ flow_item_default_mask(const struct rte_flow_item
> > *item)
> > > >         case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_GTP:
> > > >                 mask = &rte_flow_item_gtp_mask;
> > > >                 break;
> > > > -       case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_ESP:
> > > > -               mask = &rte_flow_item_esp_mask;
> > > > -               break;
> > > >         case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_GTP_PSC:
> > > >                 mask = &rte_flow_item_gtp_psc_mask;
> > > >                 break;
> > > >         case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_PPPOE_PROTO_ID:
> > > >                 mask = &rte_flow_item_pppoe_proto_id_mask;
> > > > +               break;
> > > > +       case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_ESP:
> > > > +               mask = &rte_flow_item_esp_mask;
> > > > +               break;
> > > >         default:
> > > >                 break;
> > > >         }
> > > > @@ -6327,6 +6354,10 @@ cmd_set_raw_parsed(const struct buffer
> *in)
> > > >                 case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_GENEVE:
> > > >                         size = sizeof(struct rte_flow_item_geneve);
> > > >                         break;
> > > > +               case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_ESP:
> > > > +                       size = sizeof(struct rte_flow_item_esp);
> > > > +                       proto = 0x32;
> > > > +                       break;
> > > >                 default:
> > > >                         printf("Error - Not supported item\n");
> > > >                         *total_size = 0;
> > > > --
> > > > 2.7.4


Regards,

Bernard.

Reply via email to