On 11/13/2019 7:08 AM, Rosen Xu wrote:
> From: Andy Pei <andy....@intel.com>
>
> In ipn3ke, each FPGA network side port bonding to an i40e pf,
> each i40e pf link status should get data from FPGA network,
> side port. This patch provide bonding relationship.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rosen Xu <rosen...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Pei <andy....@intel.com>
<...>
> @@ -1061,4 +1061,22 @@ int rte_pmd_i40e_inset_set(uint16_t port, uint8_t
> pctype,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * For ipn3ke, i40e works with FPGA.
> + * In this situation, i40e get link status from fpga,
> + * fpga works as switch_dev for i40e.
> + * This function set switch_dev for i40e.
> + *
> + * @param inset
> + * Input set value.
> + * @param field_idx
> + * Field index for input set.
These params are wrong, can you please provide proper information, I can update
them in next-net?
> + * @return
> + * - (less than 0) if failed.
> + * - (0) if success.
> + */
> +__rte_experimental
> +int
> +rte_pmd_i40e_set_switch_dev(uint16_t port_id, struct rte_eth_dev
> *switch_dev);
> +
> #endif /* _PMD_I40E_H_ */
> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/rte_pmd_i40e_version.map
> b/drivers/net/i40e/rte_pmd_i40e_version.map
> index cccd576..79641f2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/rte_pmd_i40e_version.map
> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/rte_pmd_i40e_version.map
> @@ -64,4 +64,10 @@ DPDK_18.02 {
>
> rte_pmd_i40e_inset_get;
> rte_pmd_i40e_inset_set;
> -} DPDK_17.11;
> \ No newline at end of file
> +} DPDK_17.11;
> +
> +EXPERIMENTAL {
> + global:
> +
> + rte_pmd_i40e_set_switch_dev;
> +} DPDK_18.02;
The 'DPDK_18.02' part is not required for experimental block, I will remove it
while merging.
