Hi,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wang, ShougangX
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 11:50 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Yang, Qiming <qiming.y...@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z
> <qi.z.zh...@intel.com>; Wang, ShougangX <shougangx.w...@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v4 2/4] net/ice: fix removal of FDIR profile
>
> The removal of FDIR profile should start from the next of
> ICE_FLTR_PTYPE_NONF_NONE.
>
> Fixes: 109e8e06249e ("net/ice: configure HW flow director rule")
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang ShougangX <shougangx.w...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ice/ice_fdir_filter.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/ice_fdir_filter.c
> b/drivers/net/ice/ice_fdir_filter.c
> index a89c506c0..039e00a28 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ice/ice_fdir_filter.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ice/ice_fdir_filter.c
> @@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ ice_fdir_prof_rm_all(struct ice_pf *pf) {
> enum ice_fltr_ptype ptype;
>
> - for (ptype = ICE_FLTR_PTYPE_NONF_NONE;
> + for (ptype = ICE_FLTR_PTYPE_NONF_NONE + 1;
I think we should also use ICE_FLTR_PTYPE_NONF_NONE + 1 instead of
ICE_FLTR_PTYPE_TCP_IPV4 in prof_add,
To make sure it is symmetric. And it should be contained in this patch.
> ptype < ICE_FLTR_PTYPE_MAX;
> ptype++) {
> ice_fdir_prof_rm(pf, ptype, false);
> --
> 2.17.1
