Hi, Qi

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhang, Qi Z
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 3:51 PM
> To: Wang, ShougangX <shougangx.w...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Yang, Qiming <qiming.y...@intel.com>; Xing, Beilei
> <beilei.x...@intel.com>; Wang, ShougangX <shougangx.w...@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] net/ice: fix removal of FDIR profile
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev <dev-boun...@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Wang ShougangX
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 8:51 AM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Yang, Qiming <qiming.y...@intel.com>; Xing, Beilei
> > <beilei.x...@intel.com>; Wang, ShougangX <shougangx.w...@intel.com>
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] net/ice: fix removal of FDIR
> > profile
> >
> > The removal of FDIR profile should start from
> > ICE_FLTR_PTYPE_NONF_IPV4_UDP.
> >
> > Fixes: 109e8e06249e ("net/ice: configure HW flow director rule")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wang ShougangX <shougangx.w...@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ice/ice_fdir_filter.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/ice_fdir_filter.c
> > b/drivers/net/ice/ice_fdir_filter.c
> > index a89c506c0..f728b9062 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ice/ice_fdir_filter.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ice/ice_fdir_filter.c
> > @@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ ice_fdir_prof_rm_all(struct ice_pf *pf)  {
> >     enum ice_fltr_ptype ptype;
> >
> > -   for (ptype = ICE_FLTR_PTYPE_NONF_NONE;
> > +   for (ptype = ICE_FLTR_PTYPE_NONF_IPV4_UDP;
> 
> Is "ptype = ICE_FLTR_PTYPE_NONF_NONE + 1" better?, so we don't need to
> worry profile be re-ordered or new one be inserted in future.
yes, it is better. I will change it in next version. Thank you very much.

> 
> 
> >          ptype < ICE_FLTR_PTYPE_MAX;
> >          ptype++) {
> >             ice_fdir_prof_rm(pf, ptype, false);
> > --
> > 2.17.1

Thanks.
Shougang

Reply via email to