Thanks David. With Anatoly's patch applied my patch is not needed as the purpose is solved.
Regards, Rajesh On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 9:21 PM David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 2:55 PM David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 6:14 PM Burakov, Anatoly > > <anatoly.bura...@intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > On 05-Nov-19 3:18 PM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote: > > > > On 05-Nov-19 2:10 PM, Rajesh Ravi wrote: > > > >> Thanks a lot Anatoly. > > > >> Will the same solution work with DPDK 19.02 as well? We 're > actually > > > >> using DPDK 19.02 for memory allocations for SPDK 19.07. > > > >> DPDK 19.11 may not be supported by SPDK 19.07 we 're currently > using. > > > >> > > > >> I 'll definitely test if the patch works with DPDK 19.02 > > > >> > > > >> Thanks again for your time and help. > > > >> > > > >> Regards, > > > >> Rajesh > > > > > > > > Hi Rajesh, > > > > > > > > Please test the patch [1] and see if it works for you. The patch is > not > > > > intended for 19.02 (in fact, 19.02 is not even supported any more), > but > > > > it may still apply. In the meantime, i'm working on a different patch > > > > for 18.11, that will achieve the same thing using different means. > > > > > > > > [1] http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/62468/ > > > > > > > > > > The following is an alternative implementation that is based off 18.11: > > > > > > http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/62486/ > > > > Thanks Rajesh, following your test report, I applied Anatoly patch. > A backport will go to 18.11. > > I will mark this current proposal as rejected. > If you think it should still be considered, then please set this patch > state back to new in patchwork and explain what is missing in this > thread. > > > Thanks. > -- > David Marchand > > -- Regards, Rajesh
