On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 2:55 PM David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 6:14 PM Burakov, Anatoly > <anatoly.bura...@intel.com> wrote: > > > > On 05-Nov-19 3:18 PM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote: > > > On 05-Nov-19 2:10 PM, Rajesh Ravi wrote: > > >> Thanks a lot Anatoly. > > >> Will the same solution work with DPDK 19.02 as well? We 're actually > > >> using DPDK 19.02 for memory allocations for SPDK 19.07. > > >> DPDK 19.11 may not be supported by SPDK 19.07 we 're currently using. > > >> > > >> I 'll definitely test if the patch works with DPDK 19.02 > > >> > > >> Thanks again for your time and help. > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> Rajesh > > > > > > Hi Rajesh, > > > > > > Please test the patch [1] and see if it works for you. The patch is not > > > intended for 19.02 (in fact, 19.02 is not even supported any more), but > > > it may still apply. In the meantime, i'm working on a different patch > > > for 18.11, that will achieve the same thing using different means. > > > > > > [1] http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/62468/ > > > > > > > The following is an alternative implementation that is based off 18.11: > > > > http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/62486/ >
Thanks Rajesh, following your test report, I applied Anatoly patch. A backport will go to 18.11. I will mark this current proposal as rejected. If you think it should still be considered, then please set this patch state back to new in patchwork and explain what is missing in this thread. Thanks. -- David Marchand
