Coverity complains that this statement is not needed as the goto
label is on the next line anyway. Remove the if statement.
653 ret = ipn3ke_cfg_parse_i40e_pf_ethdev(afu_name, pf_name);
CID 337930 (#1 of 1): Identical code for different branches
(IDENTICAL_BRANCHES)identical_branches: The same code is executed
when the condition ret is true or false, because the code in the
if-then branch and after the if statement is identical. Should
the if statement be removed?
654 if (ret)
655 goto end;
implicit_else: The code from the above if-then branch is identical
to the code after the if statement.
656end:
Coverity issue: 337930
Fixes: c01c748e4ae6 ("net/ipn3ke: add new driver")
Cc: rosen...@intel.com
Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com>
---
drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_ethdev.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_ethdev.c
b/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_ethdev.c
index 28d8aaf2d..af87fda6b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_ethdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ipn3ke/ipn3ke_ethdev.c
@@ -738,6 +738,5 @@ ipn3ke_cfg_probe(struct rte_vdev_device *dev)
ret = ipn3ke_cfg_parse_i40e_pf_ethdev(afu_name, pf_name);
- if (ret)
- goto end;
+
end:
if (kvlist)
--
2.21.0
