On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 12:43 AM David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com>
wrote:
> Hello Ajit, Kevin,
>
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 3:29 AM Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 6:04 AM Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > If rc contains a non-zero return code from bnxt_hwrm_send_message(),
> > > HWRM_CHECK_RESULT_SILENT() will return.
> > >
> > > Just after that code, there is an 'if (!rc) {...} else {...}'.
> > > Coverity is complaining that this if else statement is dead code as
> > > rc will always be 0 if that code is reached.
> > >
> > > 4309 rc = bnxt_hwrm_send_message(bp, &req, sizeof(req),
> > > BNXT_USE_CHIMP_MB);
> > > cond_const: Condition rc, taking false branch.
> > > Now the value of rc is equal to 0.
> > > 4310 HWRM_CHECK_RESULT_SILENT();
> > > 4311
> > > const: At condition rc, the value of rc must be equal to 0.
> > > dead_error_condition: The condition !rc must be true.
> > > 4312 if (!rc) {
> > >
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > 4373 } else {
> > > CID 343450 (#1 of 1): Logically dead code
> > > (DEADCODE)dead_error_line: Execution cannot
> > > reach this statement: rc = 0;.
> > > 4374 rc = 0;
> > > 4375 }
> > >
> > > Coverity issue: 343450
> > > Fixes: f8168ca0e690 ("net/bnxt: support thor controller")
> > > Cc: lance.richard...@broadcom.com
> > > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com>
> > >
> > Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com>
>
> I can see a *really* close patch has been submitted the day after.
> http://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/58352/
>
> And merged after a v3:
>
> https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=b4f74051165560aa81814433dea7e6eb0bdb32b9
>
> So I suppose this patch can be dropped.
>
> Yes. That makes sense.
Thanks for checking.
Thanks
Ajit
>
> --
> David Marchand
>
