Hello Ajit, Kevin,
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 3:29 AM Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 6:04 AM Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > If rc contains a non-zero return code from bnxt_hwrm_send_message(),
> > HWRM_CHECK_RESULT_SILENT() will return.
> >
> > Just after that code, there is an 'if (!rc) {...} else {...}'.
> > Coverity is complaining that this if else statement is dead code as
> > rc will always be 0 if that code is reached.
> >
> > 4309 rc = bnxt_hwrm_send_message(bp, &req, sizeof(req),
> > BNXT_USE_CHIMP_MB);
> > cond_const: Condition rc, taking false branch.
> > Now the value of rc is equal to 0.
> > 4310 HWRM_CHECK_RESULT_SILENT();
> > 4311
> > const: At condition rc, the value of rc must be equal to 0.
> > dead_error_condition: The condition !rc must be true.
> > 4312 if (!rc) {
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > 4373 } else {
> > CID 343450 (#1 of 1): Logically dead code
> > (DEADCODE)dead_error_line: Execution cannot
> > reach this statement: rc = 0;.
> > 4374 rc = 0;
> > 4375 }
> >
> > Coverity issue: 343450
> > Fixes: f8168ca0e690 ("net/bnxt: support thor controller")
> > Cc: lance.richard...@broadcom.com
> > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com>
> >
> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com>
I can see a *really* close patch has been submitted the day after.
http://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/58352/
And merged after a v3:
https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=b4f74051165560aa81814433dea7e6eb0bdb32b9
So I suppose this patch can be dropped.
--
David Marchand
