06/08/2019 13:18, Thomas Monjalon: > 26/07/2019 12:15, Burakov, Anatoly: > > So it's biased towards scaling up quickly, but it's doing that over a > > period. Please correct me if i'm wrong as i'm not really familiar with > > this codebase, but, assuming the window size is long enough, you could > > be missing opportunities to scale down? For example, if you get a short > > burst of 1's followed by a long burst of zeroes, you're not scaling down > > until you go through the entire buffer and overwrite all of the values. > > I guess that's the point of oscillation prevention, but maybe you could > > improve the "scale-up" part by only checking a few recent values, rather > > than the entire buffer? > > This patch is deferred to 19.11.
Any news for this patch?
