On 10/21/2019 11:50 AM, Gagandeep Singh wrote:
> enetc BD rings should be aligned to 128
> instead of RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE.

This looks like a fix, if so can you please update commit log according, via
fixes line etc..

> 
> Signed-off-by: Gagandeep Singh <g.si...@nxp.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/enetc/base/enetc_hw.h | 3 +++
>  drivers/net/enetc/enetc_ethdev.c  | 8 ++++----
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/enetc/base/enetc_hw.h 
> b/drivers/net/enetc/base/enetc_hw.h
> index fd71155ee..2fe7ccb5b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/enetc/base/enetc_hw.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/enetc/base/enetc_hw.h
> @@ -12,6 +12,9 @@
>  #define ENETC_DEV_ID_VF              0xef00
>  #define ENETC_DEV_ID         0xe100
>  
> +/* BD RING ALIGNMENT */
> +#define ENETC_BD_RING_ALIGN  128
> +
>  /* ENETC register block BAR */
>  #define ENETC_BAR_REGS                       0x0
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/net/enetc/enetc_ethdev.c 
> b/drivers/net/enetc/enetc_ethdev.c
> index dc05c00ff..4e978348c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/enetc/enetc_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/enetc/enetc_ethdev.c
> @@ -178,12 +178,12 @@ enetc_alloc_txbdr(struct enetc_bdr *txr, uint16_t 
> nb_desc)
>       int size;
>  
>       size = nb_desc * sizeof(struct enetc_swbd);
> -     txr->q_swbd = rte_malloc(NULL, size, RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE);
> +     txr->q_swbd = rte_malloc(NULL, size, ENETC_BD_RING_ALIGN);
>       if (txr->q_swbd == NULL)
>               return -ENOMEM;
>  
>       size = nb_desc * sizeof(struct enetc_tx_bd);
> -     txr->bd_base = rte_malloc(NULL, size, RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE);
> +     txr->bd_base = rte_malloc(NULL, size, ENETC_BD_RING_ALIGN);
>       if (txr->bd_base == NULL) {
>               rte_free(txr->q_swbd);
>               txr->q_swbd = NULL;
> @@ -325,12 +325,12 @@ enetc_alloc_rxbdr(struct enetc_bdr *rxr,
>       int size;
>  
>       size = nb_rx_desc * sizeof(struct enetc_swbd);
> -     rxr->q_swbd = rte_malloc(NULL, size, RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE);
> +     rxr->q_swbd = rte_malloc(NULL, size, ENETC_BD_RING_ALIGN);
>       if (rxr->q_swbd == NULL)
>               return -ENOMEM;
>  
>       size = nb_rx_desc * sizeof(union enetc_rx_bd);
> -     rxr->bd_base = rte_malloc(NULL, size, RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE);
> +     rxr->bd_base = rte_malloc(NULL, size, ENETC_BD_RING_ALIGN);
>       if (rxr->bd_base == NULL) {
>               rte_free(rxr->q_swbd);
>               rxr->q_swbd = NULL;
> 

Reply via email to