Hi Ciara, snipped > > ifaces no pinning pinning > 1 9059100 9171612 > 2 9261635 18376552 > 3 9332804 27696702 > > For the no-pinning case, all IRQs are landing on the default core 0, which > results in very poor scaling versus the pinned case where scaling is linear.
Thanks for the information, but a question here `Is the reason for landing all IRQ on core '0' is because the Kernel CMD line 'isol or no interupts' is done for all expect core 0?` If the cores are not isolated and no interrupts are redirected; normally `cat /proc/interrupts` shows IRQ mask to cores. Depending upon FDIR (intel X522 and X710) this could be core 0 or 'n-1'? > > Thanks, > Ciara > > > > > It should be possible to rework the code to remove the regexes and use > > a direct string compare. Would that make the solution more palatable? > > > > Let me know what you think. > > > > Thanks, > > Ciara
