Hi Jerin, > -----Original Message----- > From: Jerin Jacob <jerinjac...@gmail.com> > Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2019 4:04 PM > To: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavat...@marvell.com> > Cc: Jerin Jacob <jer...@marvell.com>; Richardson, Bruce > <bruce.richard...@intel.com>; Akhil Goyal <akhil.go...@nxp.com>; dpdk- > dev <dev@dpdk.org>; Van Haaren, Harry <harry.van.haa...@intel.com>; > mattias.ronnb...@ericsson.com; liang.j...@intel.com; Gujjar, Abhinandan > S <abhinandan.guj...@intel.com>; Rao, Nikhil <nikhil....@intel.com>; > Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>; erik.g.carri...@intel.com > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 00/10] example/l2fwd-event: introduce > l2fwd-event example > Importance: High > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 2:28 AM <pbhagavat...@marvell.com> wrote: > > > > From: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavat...@marvell.com> > > > > This patchset adds a new application to demonstrate the usage of event > > mode. The poll mode is also available to help with the transition. > > > > The following new command line parameters are added: > > --mode: Dictates the mode of operation either poll or event. > > --eventq_sync: Dictates event synchronization mode either atomic or > > ordered. > > > > Based on event device capability the configuration is done as follows: > > - A single event device is enabled. > > - The number of event ports is equal to the number of worker > > cores enabled in the core mask. Additional event ports might > > be configured based on Rx/Tx adapter capability. > > - The number of event queues is equal to the number of ethernet > > ports. If Tx adapter doesn't have internal port capability then > > an additional single link event queue is used to enqueue events > > to Tx adapter. > > - Each event port is linked to all existing event queues. > > - Dedicated Rx/Tx adapters for each Ethernet port. > > > > v5 Changes: > > - Redo poll mode datapath by removing all the static globals. > > - Fix event queue configuration when required queues are not available. > > - Fix Rx/Tx adapter creation based on portmask. > > - Update release notes. > > - Unroll macro used to generate event mode functions. > > > > > Adding all eventdev maintainers. > > I have some minor comments on Documentation. Other than that, The series > looks good to me in general. > Anyone else planning to review this code. If yes, We will wait for merging > this > patch after RC1. > If no, then we can merge in RC1 if no objection. [Hemant] On a high level this series looks good to us. However currently we are in the process of testing it. Will you please wait for our ack? Currently we are trying to completed it before RC1
Regards, Hemant
