Hi Bernard,
On 9/13/19 1:18 PM, Iremonger, Bernard wrote:
Hi Ivan,
-----Original Message-----
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Rybchenko
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2019 5:42 PM
To: Neil Horman <nhor...@tuxdriver.com>; Mcnamara, John
<john.mcnam...@intel.com>; Kovacevic, Marko
<marko.kovace...@intel.com>; Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>;
Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Ivan Ilchenko <ivan.ilche...@oktetlabs.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 02/54] ethdev: change
rte_eth_dev_info_get() return value to int
From: Ivan Ilchenko <ivan.ilche...@oktetlabs.com>
Change rte_eth_dev_info_get() return value from void to int and return
negative errno values in case of error conditions.
Modify rte_eth_dev_info_get() usage across the ethdev according to new
return type.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Ilchenko <ivan.ilche...@oktetlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybche...@solarflare.com>
Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>
./check-git-log.sh -1
Wrong headline format:
ethdev: change rte_eth_dev_info_get() return value to int
In this particular case we decided (may be incorrectly) that it would
be more harm if we rephrase it without mentioning function name.
It is trivial to fix. No strong opinion.
My main goal of yesterday re-spin was to check build with missing
patch applied to DPDK main repo, but unfortunately there are still
some build issues (meson column) which I don't understand.
Andrew.
