On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 03:24:35PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 17:32:38 +0530
> Santosh Shukla <sshukla at mvista.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Santosh Shukla <sshukla at mvista.com>
> > wrote:
> > > virtio_recv_pkts_vec and other virtio vector friend apis are written for
> > > sse/avx
> > > instructions. For arm64 in particular, virtio vector implementation does
> > > not
> > > exist(todo).
> > >
> > > So virtio pmd driver wont build for targets like i686, arm64. By making
> > > RTE_VIRTIO_INC_VECTOR=n, Driver can build for non-sse/avx targets and
> > > will work
> > > in non-vectored virtio mode.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Santosh Shukla <sshukla at mvista.com>
> > > ---
> >
> > Ping?
> >
> > any review / comment on this patch much appreciated. Thanks
>
> The patches I posted (and were ignored by Intel) to support indirect
Sorry, I thought it was reviewed and got applied (and I just started to
review patches for virtio recently).
So, would you please send it out again? I will have a review and test ASAP.
--yliu
> and any layout should have much bigger performance gain than all this
> low level SSE bit twiddling.
