On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 5:24 AM Stephen Hemminger
<step...@networkplumber.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 11:06:10 +0800
> Haiyue Wang <haiyue.w...@intel.com> wrote:

> >  int rte_eth_tx_queue_info_get(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t queue_id,
> >       struct rte_eth_txq_info *qinfo);
> >
> > +int
> > +rte_eth_trace_info_get(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t queue_id,
> > +     enum rte_eth_trace type, char *buf, int sz);
> > +
>
> You didn't run checkpatch, otherwise you would have seen complaints
> about not listing API as experimental.

The checks in checkpatches.sh won't catch this.
But trying to build dpdk as a shared library will.

Example: https://travis-ci.com/david-marchand/dpdk/jobs/224737320


-- 
David Marchand

Reply via email to