Hi Ayuj,
I believe there are couple of issues with this patch.
Are these experimental APIs? I believe they were made stable this release and
I'm not sure if it is a right practice to edit an API without deprecation
notice after it is made stable. Especially now that RC2 is done. @Akhil, what
is your take on this?
I think, the approach here is wrong. If the lifetime of the session is expected
to be only few packets, then session-less (which I believe is in the pipeline)
would make more sense. If the lifetime of the session is expected to be more
than that, then having this feature/limitation would make application more
complicated. Also, since one asymmetric session can hold both public & private
keys, the implicit assumption would be, the session can be used for multiple
kinds of operations. This change is in contradiction with that.
But my major concern is how this can lead to accidental errors. Making the
argument as const will mean the API won't edit its contents. But if there is a
pointer in that (key happens to be a pointer inside the xform), having const
for xform will not help. This is my understanding. Please correct me if I'm
wrong. Also, I could have the xform allocated from stack (non const, regular
local variable) and then call the session_init. Would compiler throw an issue
in that case? I doubt so.
void abc(const int t)
{
printf("%d\n", t);
}
void main()
{
int t = 0;
abc(t);
t = 2;
abc(t);
}
To summarize, if this assumption is accepted, then compiler will not be able to
ensure it. And to properly use it, application will have to be drafted
differently. And when similar effect can be achieved by having session-less,
this seems redundant.
So this change is NACK from my side.
Thanks,
Anoob
From: Ayuj Verma
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2019 2:23 PM
To: akhil.go...@nxp.com
Cc: arkadiuszx.kusz...@intel.com; Shally Verma <shal...@marvell.com>; Sunila
Sahu <ss...@marvell.com>; Kanaka Durga Kotamarthy <kkotamar...@marvell.com>;
Anoob Joseph <ano...@marvell.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Fiona Trahe
<fiona.tr...@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] declare crypto asym xform immutable
+Fiona.
________________________________
From: Ayuj Verma <ayve...@marvell.com<mailto:ayve...@marvell.com>>
Sent: 24 July 2019 14:21:55
To: akhil.go...@nxp.com<mailto:akhil.go...@nxp.com>
<akhil.go...@nxp.com<mailto:akhil.go...@nxp.com>>
Cc: arkadiuszx.kusz...@intel.com<mailto:arkadiuszx.kusz...@intel.com>
<arkadiuszx.kusz...@intel.com<mailto:arkadiuszx.kusz...@intel.com>>; Shally
Verma <shal...@marvell.com<mailto:shal...@marvell.com>>; Sunila Sahu
<ss...@marvell.com<mailto:ss...@marvell.com>>; Kanaka Durga Kotamarthy
<kkotamar...@marvell.com<mailto:kkotamar...@marvell.com>>; Anoob Joseph
<ano...@marvell.com<mailto:ano...@marvell.com>>;
dev@dpdk.org<mailto:dev@dpdk.org> <dev@dpdk.org<mailto:dev@dpdk.org>>; Ayuj
Verma <ayve...@marvell.com<mailto:ayve...@marvell.com>>
Subject: [PATCH v1 0/2] declare crypto asym xform immutable
Mark asym xform as immutable till lifetime
of session. It will save session setup time for
PMDs, which doesn't require any manipulation of
xform data, by directly using these buffers.
* Updated xform type in session init/configure
API as constant.
* Updated doc with proper transform description.
* Updated openssl PMD with above changes.
Ayuj Verma (2):
lib/crypto: declare crypto asym xform immutable
crypto/openssl: mark asym xform constant
doc/guides/prog_guide/cryptodev_lib.rst | 10 ++++++++++
drivers/crypto/openssl/rte_openssl_pmd_ops.c | 8 ++++----
lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c | 2 +-
lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h | 2 +-
lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev_pmd.h | 2 +-
5 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--
1.8.3.1
