Hi Harman, On 05/07/2019 11:05, Harman Kalra wrote:
No of workers should never exceed RTE_MAX_LCORE. RTE_DIST_ALG_SINGLE also require no of workers check.Fixes: 775003ad2f96 ("distributor: add new burst-capable library") Cc: sta...@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: Harman Kalra <hka...@marvell.com> --- lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c b/lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c index 208abfb1d..bfcc536fd 100644 --- a/lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c +++ b/lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c @@ -595,6 +595,12 @@ rte_distributor_create_v1705(const char *name, RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON((sizeof(*d) & RTE_CACHE_LINE_MASK) != 0); RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON((RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS & 7) != 0);+ if (name == NULL || num_workers >=+ (unsigned int)RTE_MIN(RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS, RTE_MAX_LCORE)) { + rte_errno = EINVAL; + return NULL; + } + if (alg_type == RTE_DIST_ALG_SINGLE) { d = malloc(sizeof(struct rte_distributor)); if (d == NULL) { @@ -612,11 +618,6 @@ rte_distributor_create_v1705(const char *name, return d; }- if (name == NULL || num_workers >= RTE_DISTRIB_MAX_WORKERS) {- rte_errno = EINVAL; - return NULL; - } - snprintf(mz_name, sizeof(mz_name), RTE_DISTRIB_PREFIX"%s", name); mz = rte_memzone_reserve(mz_name, sizeof(*d), socket_id, NO_FLAGS); if (mz == NULL) {
Builds OK, runs OK. Change makes sense, also good to move the check to the new location.
Acked-by: David Hunt <david.h...@intel.com>
