Hi Wei,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Wei Zhao
> Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2019 6:24 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org; Zhao1, Wei <wei.zh...@intel.com>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix to add offloads confguration
> for queue
> 
> When adding offloads from commandline, not only port related configuration
> bits should be set, but also queue related offloads configuration bits, or it 
> will
> cause error.
> For example, test in this process for ixgbe:
> (1)./x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/app/testpmd -c 0x6 -n 4
> -- -i --portmask=0x1 --port-topology=loop --disable-crc-strip (2)port stop all
> (3)port config all crc-strip on (4)port start all we will see "Fail to 
> configure port
> 0 rx queues" of warning info.
> 
> Fixes: 0074d02fca21 ("app/testpmd: convert to new Rx offloads API")


./devtools/check-git-log.sh -1
Is it candidate for Cc: sta...@dpdk.org backport?
        app/testpmd: fix to add offloads confguration for queue

> 
> Signed-off-by: wei zhao <wei.zh...@intel.com>
> ---
>  app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c index
> d1e0d44..1b2daa1 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> @@ -2047,6 +2047,7 @@ cmd_config_rx_mode_flag_parsed(void
> *parsed_result,  {
>       struct cmd_config_rx_mode_flag *res = parsed_result;
>       portid_t pid;
> +     int k;
> 
>       if (!all_ports_stopped()) {
>               printf("Please stop all ports first\n"); @@ -2147,6 +2148,10
> @@ cmd_config_rx_mode_flag_parsed(void *parsed_result,
>                       return;
>               }
>               port->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads = rx_offloads;
> +             /* Apply Rx offloads configuration */
> +             for (k = 0; k < port->dev_info.max_rx_queues; k++)
> +                     port->rx_conf[k].offloads =
> +                             port->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads;
>       }
> 
>       init_port_config();
> @@ -4368,6 +4373,7 @@ cmd_csum_parsed(void *parsed_result,
>       int hw = 0;
>       uint64_t csum_offloads = 0;
>       struct rte_eth_dev_info dev_info;
> +     int k;
> 
>       if (port_id_is_invalid(res->port_id, ENABLED_WARN)) {
>               printf("invalid port %d\n", res->port_id); @@ -4443,6
> +4449,10 @@ cmd_csum_parsed(void *parsed_result,
>                       ports[res->port_id].dev_conf.txmode.offloads &=
>                                                       (~csum_offloads);
>               }
> +             /* Apply Tx offloads configuration */
> +             for (k = 0; k < ports[res->port_id].dev_info.max_tx_queues;
> k++)
> +                     ports[res->port_id].tx_conf[k].offloads =
> +                             ports[res-
> >port_id].dev_conf.txmode.offloads;
>       }

The above block of code seems to be duplicated 3 times in this patch.
It would probably be better to put it in a function and call the function 3 
times.

>       csum_show(res->port_id);
> 
> @@ -4565,6 +4575,7 @@ cmd_tso_set_parsed(void *parsed_result,  {
>       struct cmd_tso_set_result *res = parsed_result;
>       struct rte_eth_dev_info dev_info;
> +     int k;
> 
>       if (port_id_is_invalid(res->port_id, ENABLED_WARN))
>               return;
> @@ -4594,6 +4605,10 @@ cmd_tso_set_parsed(void *parsed_result,
>               printf("TSO segment size for non-tunneled packets is %d\n",
>                       ports[res->port_id].tso_segsz);
>       }
> +     /* Apply Tx offloads configuration */
> +     for (k = 0; k < ports[res->port_id].dev_info.max_tx_queues; k++)
> +             ports[res->port_id].tx_conf[k].offloads =
> +                     ports[res->port_id].dev_conf.txmode.offloads;

The above block of code seems to be duplicated 3 times in this patch.

> 
>       /* display warnings if configuration is not supported by the NIC */
>       rte_eth_dev_info_get(res->port_id, &dev_info); @@ -4694,6
> +4709,7 @@ cmd_tunnel_tso_set_parsed(void *parsed_result,  {
>       struct cmd_tunnel_tso_set_result *res = parsed_result;
>       struct rte_eth_dev_info dev_info;
> +     int k;
> 
>       if (port_id_is_invalid(res->port_id, ENABLED_WARN))
>               return;
> @@ -4747,6 +4763,10 @@ cmd_tunnel_tso_set_parsed(void
> *parsed_result,
>                     DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_OUTER_IPV4_CKSUM))
>                       printf("Warning: csum set outer-ip must be set to hw
> "
>                               "if outer L3 is IPv4; not necessary for
> IPv6\n");
> +             /* Apply Tx offloads configuration */
> +             for (k = 0; k < ports[res->port_id].dev_info.max_tx_queues;
> k++)
> +                     ports[res->port_id].tx_conf[k].offloads =
> +                             ports[res-
> >port_id].dev_conf.txmode.offloads;
>       }

The above block of code seems to be duplicated 3 times in this patch.

> 
>       cmd_reconfig_device_queue(res->port_id, 1, 1);
> --
> 2.7.5

Regards,

Bernard.

Reply via email to