Hi Akhil, >> >> Update of the release notes for BBDEV features add and extension of >> ABI in previous commit. >> >> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chau...@intel.com> >> --- >> doc/guides/rel_notes/release_19_08.rst | 15 +++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_19_08.rst >> b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_19_08.rst >> index 8c3932d..35d3a09 100644 >> --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_19_08.rst >> +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_19_08.rst >> @@ -88,6 +88,19 @@ New Features >> * Added multi-queue support to allow one af_xdp vdev with multiple netdev >> queues >> >> +* **Added a FPGA_LTE_FEC bbdev PMD.** >> + >> + Added the new ``fpga_lte_fec`` bbdev driver for the Intel® FPGA >> + PAC (Programmable Acceleration Card) N3000. See the >> + :doc:`../bbdevs/fpga_lte_fec` BBDEV guide for more details on this new >> driver. >> + >> +* **Updated TURBO_SW bbdev PMD.** >> + >> + Updated the ``turbo_sw`` bbdev driver with changes including: >> + >> + * Added option to build the driver with or without dependency of external >> + SDK libraries. >> + * Added support for 5GNR encode/decode operations. >> >> Removed Items >> ------------- >> @@ -140,6 +153,8 @@ ABI Changes >> Also, make sure to start the actual text at the margin. >> ========================================================= >> >> +* bbdev: New parameters added to support 5GNR operations. >> + >> >> Shared Library Versions >> ----------------------- >> -- >> 1.8.3.1 > >Release note changes should be part of the same patch which is adding that >change.
No problem, I am pushing an updated serie : https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=5259 >One more thing, if there is a change in ABI, should you also increment the >bbdev ABI version? The bbdev ABI is still marked as __rte_experimental hence I don't believe we have yet to increment it. >Please also send a rebased version of your patchset, so that builds can be >verified by CI. The dependent patches are applied on the sub-tree. OK, I did this on the serie above. Note that the previous was already verified with CI since I kept the dependency within the previous serie. Still cleaner now, you should just have to apply the serie as is now. Thanks! Nic
