2015-12-02 20:04, Jerin Jacob: > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 09:13:51PM +0800, Jianbo Liu wrote: > > On 2 December 2015 at 18:39, Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob at > > caviumnetworks.com> wrote: > > > AND they include "rte_lpm.h"(it internally includes rte_vect.h) > > > that lead to multiple definition and its not good. > > > > > But you will have similar issue since "typedef int32x4_t __m128i" > > appears in both your patch and this header file. > > I just tested it, it won't break, back to back "typedef int32x4_t __m128i" > is fine(unlike inline function). > > my intention to keep __m128i "as is" because changing the __m128i to rte_??? > something would break the ABI.
Isn't it already broken in 2.2?