Hi Bernard,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Iremonger, Bernard
> Sent: Monday, April 8, 2019 1:26 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org; Trahe, Fiona <fiona.tr...@intel.com>; Ananyev, Konstantin
> <konstantin.anan...@intel.com>; akhil.go...@nxp.com
> Cc: Iremonger, Bernard <bernard.iremon...@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] crypto/qat: fix second seg fault in QAT PMD
> 
> While running the IPsec unit tests the following
> segmentation fault is occurring:
> 
> Thread 1 "test" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x0000000000bf3b50 in qat_sym_process_response (
> op=0x5355280 <unittest_params+512>, resp=0x100455100 "")
> at /root/dpdk/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_sym.h:161
> 161   if (sess->bpi_ctx)
> 
> Fixes: 91614c73b67c ("crypto/qat: make response process function inline")
> Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremon...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/crypto/qat/qat_sym.h | 8 +++++---
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_sym.h b/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_sym.h
> index bc6426c..685c6c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_sym.h
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_sym.h
> @@ -157,10 +157,12 @@ qat_sym_process_response(void **op, uint8_t *resp)
>                                               rx_op->sym->session,
>                                               cryptodev_qat_driver_id);
> 
> -
> -             if (sess->bpi_ctx)
> +             if (sess == NULL)
> +                     rx_op->status = RTE_CRYPTO_OP_STATUS_AUTH_FAILED;
> +             else if (sess->bpi_ctx) {
>                       qat_bpicipher_postprocess(sess, rx_op);
> -             rx_op->status = RTE_CRYPTO_OP_STATUS_SUCCESS;
> +                     rx_op->status = RTE_CRYPTO_OP_STATUS_SUCCESS;
> +             }
>       }
>       *op = (void *)rx_op;
>  }
> --
> 2.7.4
[Fiona] As for previous seg-fault- this is on data-path and likely due to the 
application sending
in an invalid session - or a session created for a symmetric PMD, but being 
sent to a
QAT asymmetric PMD - whose driver_id would not appear in the session array.
Can you make sure to check for SYMMETRIC support in capabilities.


Reply via email to