On 05/04/19 6:05 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 05/04/2019 13:38, Shreyansh Jain:
>> On 05/04/19 4:49 PM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
>>> On 05/04/19 3:13 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>>> 04/04/2019 23:29, Ferruh Yigit:
>>>>> On 4/4/2019 8:23 AM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
>>>>>> Removes some unused firmware code which was added in last bump
>>>>>> of the firmware version. No current features uses these APIs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.j...@nxp.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> <...>
>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/bus/fslmc/mc/fsl_dpci.h 
>>>>>> b/drivers/bus/fslmc/mc/fsl_dpci.h
>>>>>> index 9af9097e5..cf3d15267 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/bus/fslmc/mc/fsl_dpci.h
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/bus/fslmc/mc/fsl_dpci.h
>>>>>> @@ -108,27 +108,6 @@ int dpci_get_attributes(struct fsl_mc_io *mc_io,
>>>>>>                          uint16_t token,
>>>>>>                          struct dpci_attr *attr);
>>>>>>     
>>>>>> -/**
>>>>>> - * struct dpci_peer_attr - Structure representing the peer DPCI 
>>>>>> attributes
>>>>>> - * @peer_id:            DPCI peer id; if no peer is connected returns 
>>>>>> (-1)
>>>>>> - * @num_of_priorities:  The pper's number of receive priorities; 
>>>>>> determines the
>>>>>> - *                      number of transmit priorities for the local 
>>>>>> DPCI object
>>>>>> - */
>>>>>> -struct dpci_peer_attr {
>>>>>> -        int peer_id;
>>>>>> -        uint8_t num_of_priorities;
>>>>>> -};
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> -int dpci_get_peer_attributes(struct fsl_mc_io *mc_io,
>>>>>> -                             uint32_t cmd_flags,
>>>>>> -                             uint16_t token,
>>>>>> -                             struct dpci_peer_attr *attr);
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> -int dpci_get_link_state(struct fsl_mc_io *mc_io,
>>>>>> -                        uint32_t cmd_flags,
>>>>>> -                        uint16_t token,
>>>>>> -                        int *up);
>>>>>
>>>>> These needs to be removed from .map file too.
>>>
>>> Wow! indeed a great catch.
>>> And, yup, my bad. Sorry! I wish I had your eye-for-detail.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Removed from master.
>>>> Thanks for the catch.
>>
>> Thomas,
>> I still see this applied on the master and net-next.
>> Can you tell me how do you want me to do - send a fresh series or just
>> the delta change for map file?
> 
> I don't see them.
> Please update master and check again.
> 
> 

Once again, my bad - I thought when you mentioned "removed from master" 
meant you removed the patch. But, now I realize you meant "removed the 
symbols from map file".
Thanks for doing my work.

Reply via email to