Hi Ferruh,
> -----Original Message----- > From: Yigit, Ferruh > Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2019 1:55 AM > To: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Zhang, Qi Z > <qi.z.zh...@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 8/8] net/ice: support vector AVX2 in TX > > On 3/15/2019 6:22 AM, Wenzhuo Lu wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo...@intel.com> > > --- > > doc/guides/rel_notes/release_19_05.rst | 4 + > > drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx.c | 13 ++- > > drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx.h | 2 + > > drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx_vec_avx2.c | 158 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 4 files changed, 175 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_19_05.rst > > b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_19_05.rst > > index 61a2c73..610c4cd 100644 > > --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_19_05.rst > > +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_19_05.rst > > @@ -91,6 +91,10 @@ New Features > > > > * Added promiscuous mode support. > > > > +* **Added support of vector instructions on ICE.** > > + > > + Added support of SSE and AVX2 instructions in ICE RX and TX path. > > + > > ice documentation doesn't have any information about vector path, can you > please update it? > > I think it can be good to document when vector path is used? How to decide > scalar, sse or avx to use? What will prevent using vector path, like any > offload or any specific config? Thanks for the comments. Will add more info here. > > Thanks, > ferruh
