> >>>>>>>> diff --git a/examples/ipsec-secgw/meson.build > >>>>>>>> b/examples/ipsec-secgw/meson.build > >>>>>>>> index 77d8b298f..31f68fee2 100644 > >>>>>>>> --- a/examples/ipsec-secgw/meson.build > >>>>>>>> +++ b/examples/ipsec-secgw/meson.build > >>>>>>>> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ > >>>>>>>> # To build this example as a standalone application with an > >>>>>>>> already-installed > >>>>>>>> # DPDK instance, use 'make' > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -deps += ['security', 'lpm', 'acl', 'hash'] > >>>>>>>> +deps += ['security', 'lpm', 'acl', 'hash', 'ipsec'] > >>>>>>>> allow_experimental_apis = true > >>>>>>>> sources = files( > >>>>>>>> 'esp.c', 'ipsec.c', 'ipsec-secgw.c', 'parser.c', > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Makefile should also be updated I guess. > >>>>>> Anything particular you think is missed? > >>>>> Will it compile with makefile when IPSEC lib is disabled? > >>>> Nope, it wouldn't. > >>>> > >>> Could you be more specific and describe what particular > >>> changes in the Makefile you think are necessary? > >>> Is it a check that librte_ipsec was enabled, like one you have for > >>> rte_security: > >>> ifneq ($(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_SECURITY),y) > >>> $(error "RTE_LIBRTE_SECURITY is required to build ipsec-secgw") > >>> endif > >>> ? > >> yes > >>> Something else? > >>> BTW, why this check above is needed? > >> To ensure that user do not compile ipsec-secgw without ipsec/security lib > > ipsec-secgw depends on a lot of other libs (cryptodev, ethdev, acl, lpm, > > etc.). > > Why only these 2 dependencies require a special check? > Radu did this change in 1b028d5e81 (examples/ipsec-secgw: fix build > without security lib). > probably because the security lib was a new one and in experimental stage.
Ok, I'll replace RTE_LIBRTE_SECURITY with RTE_LIBRTE_IPSEC here. Konstantin
