On 9/4/2017 3:53 PM, sergio.gonzalez.monroy at intel.com (Sergio Gonzalez Monroy) wrote: > Hi, > > On 24/08/2016 23:17, amin.tootoonchian at intel.com (Tootoonchian, Amin) > wrote: >> Sergio, could you please review this patch? >> >> Thanks, >> Amin > > The patch status should be updated to 'Not Applicable' since similar > functionality has been implemented (commit d948f596). > Only Primary processes are allowed to call rte_eth_dev_allocate(), while > Secondary processes should call rte_eth_dev_attach_secondary()
Agreed with comment, and even after that comment many thing changed in multi process support. Patch status updated as 'Not Applicable'. > > Thanks, > Sergio > >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 8:12 AM >>> To: Tootoonchian, Amin <amin.tootoonchian at intel.com> >>> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Kerlin, MarcinX <marcinx.kerlin at intel.com> >>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: ensure consistent port id assignment >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> 2016-07-20 15:07, Tootoonchian, Amin: >>>> Thomas, your thoughts? >>> I have 2 thoughts: >>> - it is too big for 16.07 >>> - it is related to multi-process mechanism, maintained by Sergio ;) >>> >>> Sorry I won't look at it shortly. > > >
