On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 02:48:04PM +0100, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> This patch improves both descriptors dequeue and refill,
> by using the same bathing strategy as done in in-order path.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coque...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c | 237 ++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 126 insertions(+), 111 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c 
> b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
> index ebe5c74b5..59bcac2f7 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
> @@ -267,41 +267,42 @@ virtqueue_enqueue_refill_inorder(struct virtqueue *vq,
>  }
>  
>  static inline int
> -virtqueue_enqueue_recv_refill(struct virtqueue *vq, struct rte_mbuf *cookie)
> +virtqueue_enqueue_recv_refill(struct virtqueue *vq, struct rte_mbuf **cookie,
> +                             uint16_t num)
>  {
>       struct vq_desc_extra *dxp;
>       struct virtio_hw *hw = vq->hw;
> -     struct vring_desc *start_dp;
> -     uint16_t needed = 1;
> -     uint16_t head_idx, idx;
> +     struct vring_desc *start_dp = vq->vq_ring.desc;
> +     uint16_t idx, i;
>  
>       if (unlikely(vq->vq_free_cnt == 0))
>               return -ENOSPC;
> -     if (unlikely(vq->vq_free_cnt < needed))
> +     if (unlikely(vq->vq_free_cnt < num))
>               return -EMSGSIZE;
>  
> -     head_idx = vq->vq_desc_head_idx;
> -     if (unlikely(head_idx >= vq->vq_nentries))
> +     if (unlikely(vq->vq_desc_head_idx >= vq->vq_nentries))
>               return -EFAULT;
>  
> -     idx = head_idx;
> -     dxp = &vq->vq_descx[idx];
> -     dxp->cookie = (void *)cookie;
> -     dxp->ndescs = needed;
> +     for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
> +             idx = vq->vq_desc_head_idx;
> +             dxp = &vq->vq_descx[idx];
> +             dxp->cookie = (void *)cookie[i];
> +             dxp->ndescs = 1;
>  
> -     start_dp = vq->vq_ring.desc;
> -     start_dp[idx].addr =
> -             VIRTIO_MBUF_ADDR(cookie, vq) +
> -             RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM - hw->vtnet_hdr_size;
> -     start_dp[idx].len =
> -             cookie->buf_len - RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM + hw->vtnet_hdr_size;
> -     start_dp[idx].flags =  VRING_DESC_F_WRITE;
> -     idx = start_dp[idx].next;
> -     vq->vq_desc_head_idx = idx;
> -     if (vq->vq_desc_head_idx == VQ_RING_DESC_CHAIN_END)
> -             vq->vq_desc_tail_idx = idx;
> -     vq->vq_free_cnt = (uint16_t)(vq->vq_free_cnt - needed);
> -     vq_update_avail_ring(vq, head_idx);
> +             start_dp[idx].addr =
> +                     VIRTIO_MBUF_ADDR(cookie[i], vq) +
> +                     RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM - hw->vtnet_hdr_size;
> +             start_dp[idx].len =
> +                     cookie[i]->buf_len - RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM +
> +                     hw->vtnet_hdr_size;
> +             start_dp[idx].flags = VRING_DESC_F_WRITE;
> +             vq->vq_desc_head_idx = start_dp[idx].next;
> +             if (vq->vq_desc_head_idx == VQ_RING_DESC_CHAIN_END)
> +                     vq->vq_desc_tail_idx = vq->vq_desc_head_idx;

It's better to break the loop here. Or maybe move
this check out of the loop.

> +             vq_update_avail_ring(vq, idx);
> +     }
> +
> +     vq->vq_free_cnt = (uint16_t)(vq->vq_free_cnt - num);
>  
>       return 0;
>  }
[...]

Reply via email to