Hi Wenzhuo,
Please find my updates below
snipped
> > > + if (!vsi->rss_key)
> > > + vsi->rss_key = rte_zmalloc("rss_key",
> > > + vsi->rss_key_size, 0);
> > > + if (!vsi->rss_lut)
> > > + vsi->rss_lut = rte_zmalloc("rss_lut",
> > > + vsi->rss_lut_size, 0);
> >
> > 2 suggestions
> > 1. should the name be macro?
> Sorry, which name?
Would you like to convert and use as?
#define ICE_RSS_KEY "rss_key"
#define ICE_RSS_LUT "rss_lut"
And replace ' rte_zmalloc("rss_key",' as ' rte_zmalloc(ICE_RSS_KEY,'
>
> > 2. if there are multiple 810 NIC under DPDK, should not each rss be
> > different like "rss_key-%u" where it is port number?
> Sorry, don't understand the question.
Let assume we have 2 ICE_DSI NIC on PCIe bus. Then crating '
rte_zmalloc("rss_key",' for port 1 will fail since malloc region "rss_key"
already exist for port 0
>
> >
> > Snipped
> >
> > > +
> > > +static int
> > > +ice_dev_start(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) {
> > > + struct rte_eth_dev_data *data = dev->data;
> > > + struct ice_hw *hw = ICE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data-
> > > >dev_private);
> > > + struct ice_pf *pf = ICE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_PF(dev->data-
> > >dev_private);
> > > + uint16_t nb_rxq = 0;
> > > + uint16_t nb_txq, i;
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + ICE_PROC_SECONDARY_CHECK;
> >
> > Device start is not supported, but how is this differentiated from
> > primary configured device vs secondary configured device.
> >
> > Ie: primary uses black list '-b BB:DD:F' while secondary uses '-w
> > BB:DD:F'. In this case since we are checking process type this will return
> > without
> start?
Two updates with respect to your comment,
1. tool and application like dpdk-procinfo will no longer be able pull data
since you are asking to black list.
2. If there are functions which needs to shared, like primary using rx-0 and
tx-0 then secondary rx-1 and tx-1 how to make this work?
snipped
