snipped
> +
> +static int ice_init_rss(struct ice_pf *pf) {
> +     struct ice_hw *hw = ICE_PF_TO_HW(pf);
> +     struct ice_vsi *vsi = pf->main_vsi;
> +     struct rte_eth_dev *dev = pf->adapter->eth_dev;
> +     struct rte_eth_rss_conf *rss_conf;
> +     struct ice_aqc_get_set_rss_keys key;
> +     uint16_t i, nb_q;
> +     int ret = 0;
> +
> +     rss_conf = &dev->data->dev_conf.rx_adv_conf.rss_conf;
> +     nb_q = dev->data->nb_rx_queues;
> +     vsi->rss_key_size = ICE_AQC_GET_SET_RSS_KEY_DATA_RSS_KEY_SIZE;
> +     vsi->rss_lut_size = hw->func_caps.common_cap.rss_table_size;
> +
> +     if (!vsi->rss_key)
> +             vsi->rss_key = rte_zmalloc("rss_key",
> +                                        vsi->rss_key_size, 0);
> +     if (!vsi->rss_lut)
> +             vsi->rss_lut = rte_zmalloc("rss_lut",
> +                                        vsi->rss_lut_size, 0);

2 suggestions
1. should the name be macro?
2. if there are multiple 810 NIC under DPDK, should not each rss be different 
like "rss_key-%u" where it is port number?

Snipped

> +
> +static int
> +ice_dev_start(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> +{
> +     struct rte_eth_dev_data *data = dev->data;
> +     struct ice_hw *hw = ICE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data-
> >dev_private);
> +     struct ice_pf *pf = ICE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_PF(dev->data->dev_private);
> +     uint16_t nb_rxq = 0;
> +     uint16_t nb_txq, i;
> +     int ret;
> +
> +     ICE_PROC_SECONDARY_CHECK;

Device start is not supported, but how is this differentiated from primary 
configured device vs secondary configured device.

Ie: primary uses black list '-b BB:DD:F' while secondary uses '-w BB:DD:F'. In 
this case since we are checking process type this will return without start?

Snipped

> +
> +static void
> +ice_dev_stop(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> +{
> +     struct rte_eth_dev_data *data = dev->data;
> +     struct ice_pf *pf = ICE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_PF(dev->data->dev_private);
> +     uint16_t i;
> +
> +     /* avoid stopping again */
> +     if (pf->adapter_stopped)
> +             return;
> +
> +     ICE_PROC_SECONDARY_CHECK_NO_ERR;

Same as above.

snipped

Reply via email to