> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + if ((ret) | (!is_leaf)) > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is the operator here should be || ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Check is done for 'if either ret is not 0 or if it ret is 0 > > > > > > but not leaf' we skip leaf details print. If 'ret is 0 and is leaf' > > > > > > we skip continue to print > > > > > leaf details. > > > > > > > > > > IMO, using logical operator over bitwise operator is good here > > > > > in if statement > > > > . > > > > > Like below.? > > > > > > > > > > If (ret || (is_leaf == 0 )) > > > > > > > > Thanks for the information, if the logic is correct do I need to > > > > change for v6 > > > > > > > > > > OK in v6, but you can wait to hear more comments from others if any > > > before sending v6 . > > > > Ok thanks Reshma, but can you tell me how the earlier logic fails and > > runs slow compared to logical or? > > Not about faster or slower.
Now I see, I was wondering the suggestion was for improvement for performance. > > Logical operators are commonly used in decision making in C programming. > Bitwise operators are used in C programming to perform bit-level operations. > Agreed > Since , above if condition is for decision making here logical || operator > will fit > , so I am suggesting to use that. > But bitwise OR is not wrong right? > We don't need to do any bitwise manipulation in if condition to make the > decision, so bitwise | operator is not needed We can correct this in next patch set not v6 if this is only change for 'show tm'
