> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pattan, Reshma
> Sent: Friday, November 23, 2018 7:04 PM
> To: Varghese, Vipin <vipin.vargh...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org;
> tho...@monjalon.net; step...@networkplumber.org; Mcnamara, John
> <john.mcnam...@intel.com>
> Cc: Byrne, Stephen1 <stephen1.by...@intel.com>; Glynn, Michael J
> <michael.j.gl...@intel.com>; Patel, Amol <amol.pa...@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 5/9] app/procinfo: add support for show tm
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Varghese, Vipin
> > Sent: Friday, November 23, 2018 1:29 PM
> > To: Pattan, Reshma <reshma.pat...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org;
> > tho...@monjalon.net; step...@networkplumber.org; Mcnamara, John
> > <john.mcnam...@intel.com>
> > Cc: Byrne, Stephen1 <stephen1.by...@intel.com>; Glynn, Michael J
> > <michael.j.gl...@intel.com>; Patel, Amol <amol.pa...@intel.com>
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 5/9] app/procinfo: add support for show tm
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Pattan, Reshma
> > > Sent: Friday, November 23, 2018 5:21 PM
> > > To: Varghese, Vipin <vipin.vargh...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org;
> > > tho...@monjalon.net; step...@networkplumber.org; Mcnamara, John
> > > <john.mcnam...@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Byrne, Stephen1 <stephen1.by...@intel.com>; Glynn, Michael J
> > > <michael.j.gl...@intel.com>; Patel, Amol <amol.pa...@intel.com>
> > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 5/9] app/procinfo: add support for show tm
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Varghese, Vipin
> > > > Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2018 1:28 PM
> > > > To: Pattan, Reshma <reshma.pat...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org;
> > > > tho...@monjalon.net; step...@networkplumber.org; Mcnamara, John
> > > > <john.mcnam...@intel.com>
> > > > Cc: Byrne, Stephen1 <stephen1.by...@intel.com>; Glynn, Michael J
> > > > <michael.j.gl...@intel.com>; Patel, Amol <amol.pa...@intel.com>
> > > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 5/9] app/procinfo: add support for show tm
> > > >
> > > > Hi Reshma,
> > > >
> > > > <snipped>
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > + if ((ret) | (!is_leaf))
> > > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > > > Is the operator here should be || ?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Check is done for 'if either ret is not 0 or if it ret is 0 but
> > > > not leaf' we skip leaf details print. If 'ret is 0 and is leaf' we
> > > > skip continue to print
> > > leaf details.
> > >
> > > IMO, using logical operator over bitwise operator is good here in if
> > > statement
> > .
> > > Like below.?
> > >
> > > If (ret || (is_leaf == 0 ))
> >
> > Thanks for the information, if the logic is correct do I need to
> > change for v6
> >
>
> OK in v6, but you can wait to hear more comments from others if any before
> sending v6 .
Ok thanks Reshma, but can you tell me how the earlier logic fails and runs slow
compared to logical or?
