On 31-Oct-18 5:29 PM, Alejandro Lucero wrote:
Current name rte_eal_check_dma_mask does not follow the naming
used in the rest of the file.
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero <alejandro.luc...@netronome.com>
---
I don't think this belongs in the _mem_ namespace. It is usually used
for things to do with memory, while the DMA mask IMO sits firmly in the
domain of EAL, specifically bus subsystem.
However, i don't have strong feelings one way or the other, so if you do
decide to go forward with this naming...
diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map
b/lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map
index 04f624246..ef8126a97 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
rte_devargs_parsef;
rte_devargs_remove;
rte_devargs_type_count;
- rte_eal_check_dma_mask;
+ rte_mem_check_dma_mask;
...then this should be in alphabetical order.
rte_eal_cleanup;
rte_fbarray_attach;
rte_fbarray_destroy;
--
Thanks,
Anatoly
