-----Original Message----- > Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 17:13:10 +0200 > From: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> > To: Jerin Jacob <jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com> > Cc: "Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)" <gavin...@arm.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" > <dev@dpdk.org>, Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com>, > "sta...@dpdk.org" <sta...@dpdk.org>, Ola Liljedahl > <ola.liljed...@arm.com>, "olivier.m...@6wind.com" > <olivier.m...@6wind.com>, "chao...@linux.vnet.ibm.com" > <chao...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, "bruce.richard...@intel.com" > <bruce.richard...@intel.com>, "konstantin.anan...@intel.com" > <konstantin.anan...@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] ring: synchronize the load and store of > the tail > > > 27/10/2018 17:00, Jerin Jacob: > > From: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> > > > 17/10/2018 08:35, Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China): > > > > Hi Jerin > > > > > > > > As the 1st one of the 3-patch set was not concluded, I submit this > > > > 2-patch series to unblock the merge. > > > > > > The thread is totally messed up because: > > > - there is no cover letter > > > - some different series (testpmd, i40e and doc) are in the same > > > thread > > > - v4 replies to a different series > > > - this version should be a v5 but has no number > > > - this version replies to the v3 > > > - patchwork still shows v3 and "v5" > > > - replies from Ola are not quoting previous discussion > > > > > > Because of all of this, it is really difficult to follow. > > > This is probably the reason of the lack of review outside of Arm. > > > > > > One more issue: you must Cc the relevant maintainers. > > > Here: > > > - Olivier for rte_ring > > > - Chao for IBM platform > > > - Bruce and Konstantin for x86 > > > > > > Guys, it is really cool to have more Arm developpers in DPDK. > > > But please consider better formatting your discussions, it is really > > > important in our contribution workflow. > > > > > > I don't know what to do. > > > I suggest to wait for more feedbacks and integrate it in -rc2. > > > > This series has been acked and tested. Sure, if we are looking for some > > more feedback we can push to -rc2 if not it a good candidate to be > > selected for -rc1. > > It has been acked and tested only for Arm platforms. > And Olivier, the ring maintainer, was not Cc. > > I feel it is not enough.
Sure, More reviews is already better. But lets keep as -rc2 target. > >
