-----Original Message----- > Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 16:39:58 +0200 > From: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> > To: "Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)" <gavin...@arm.com> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com" > <jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com>, Honnappa Nagarahalli > <honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com>, "sta...@dpdk.org" <sta...@dpdk.org>, Ola > Liljedahl <ola.liljed...@arm.com>, olivier.m...@6wind.com, > chao...@linux.vnet.ibm.com, bruce.richard...@intel.com, > konstantin.anan...@intel.com > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] ring: synchronize the load and store of > the tail > > External Email > > 17/10/2018 08:35, Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China): > > Hi Jerin > > > > As the 1st one of the 3-patch set was not concluded, I submit this 2-patch > > series to unblock the merge. > > The thread is totally messed up because: > - there is no cover letter > - some different series (testpmd, i40e and doc) are in the same thread > - v4 replies to a different series > - this version should be a v5 but has no number > - this version replies to the v3 > - patchwork still shows v3 and "v5" > - replies from Ola are not quoting previous discussion > > Because of all of this, it is really difficult to follow. > This is probably the reason of the lack of review outside of Arm. > > One more issue: you must Cc the relevant maintainers. > Here: > - Olivier for rte_ring > - Chao for IBM platform > - Bruce and Konstantin for x86 > > Guys, it is really cool to have more Arm developpers in DPDK. > But please consider better formatting your discussions, it is really > important in our contribution workflow. > > I don't know what to do. > I suggest to wait for more feedbacks and integrate it in -rc2.
This series has been acked and tested. Sure, if we are looking for some more feedback we can push to -rc2 if not it a good candidate to be selected for -rc1. > > >
